Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 31, 2022·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Minnesota Wild 5, St. Louis Blues 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 75% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN11021428532
STL11215014231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:41STLCalle RosenAssists: Robert Thomas, Jordan Kyrou · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:02MINMathew DumbaAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Sam Steel · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:40MINRyan HartmanAssists: Frederick Gaudreau, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:01STLRobert BortuzzoAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Jordan Kyrou · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:13MINRyan HartmanGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:49MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Jordan Greenway · Snap, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:56MINJordan GreenwayENAssists: Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.79 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:41MINMatt Boldy: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 19:18STLNiko Mikkola: Holding2 min
  3. P2 8:15STLIvan Barbashev: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 13:47MINMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 5:44MINMatt Boldy: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 12:50MINJordan Greenway: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 12:50STLJosh Leivo: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 19:21MINJon Merrill: Interference2 min
  9. P3 19:21STLJosh Leivo: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 19:21MINJake Middleton: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
49% to win51% to win
← MIN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Acciari
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSTL
32Shots on goal31
4.4Expected goals2.8
63Shot attempts63
14Faceoffs won35
2Power plays4
20Penalty minutes16
19Hits20
18Blocked shots16
5Giveaways6
15Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHartman – Gaudreau – Boldy6:21

    xG 0.55–0.04 (93%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Steel10:25

    xG 0.50–0.21 (70%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  3. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar7:39

    xG 0.23–0.45 (34%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek8:14

    xG 0.36–0.75 (33%)attempts 5–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba12:26

    xG 0.95–0.28 (77%)attempts 15–12goals 2–0

  2. Spurgeon – Middleton11:38

    xG 0.95–0.33 (74%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  3. Merrill – Addison13:19

    xG 0.25–0.73 (25%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSaad – Barbashev – Acciari6:04

    xG 0.55–0.16 (78%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Buchnevich – Kyrou – Thomas6:52

    xG 0.44–0.15 (75%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Leivo – Walker – Toropchenko4:05

    xG 0.31–0.14 (69%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. O'Reilly – Schenn – Saad5:20

    xG 0.40–0.32 (55%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestParayko – Rosen2:49

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Bortuzzo – Rosen8:25

    xG 0.55–0.42 (57%)attempts 13–9goals 2–1

  3. Parayko – Mikkola14:33

    xG 0.77–0.65 (54%)attempts 13–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGMIN 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #593 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 75% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).