Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 7, 2023·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Minnesota Wild 5, Buffalo Sabres 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN0931821106544
BUF1831111414637

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:00BUFVictor OlofssonAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:52MINBrandon DuhaimeAssists: Ryan Hartman, Mathew Dumba · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:46MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Calen Addison, Sam Steel · Snap, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:30BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Dylan Cozens · Slap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:02BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:55BUFDylan CozensPPAssists: Alex Tuch · Snap, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:45MINRyan HartmanAssists: Frederick Gaudreau · Bat, 0.18 xG3–4
  8. P3 0:26MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Jordan Greenway · Deflected, 0.12 xG4–4
  9. P3 7:48MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Calen Addison, Marc-Andre Fleury · Snap, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:36BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Owen Power · Slap, 0.03 xG5–5
  11. OT 4:41BUFVictor OlofssonGWGAssists: Peyton Krebs, Rasmus Dahlin · Slap, 0.12 xG5–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:19MINKirill Kaprizov: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 5:22BUFIlya Lyubushkin: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:24BUFJack Quinn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 10:24MINConnor Dewar: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:42MINKirill Kaprizov: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:32BUFKale Clague: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 7:27BUFTyson Jost: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← MIN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBUF
44Shots on goal37
3.8Expected goals2.8
57Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won29
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
21Hits7
16Blocked shots4
0Giveaways2
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKaprizov – Steel – Boldy12:38

    xG 0.73–0.35 (68%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  2. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek9:49

    xG 0.49–0.27 (65%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  3. Hartman – Gaudreau – Duhaime10:34

    xG 0.74–0.66 (53%)attempts 10–14goals 2–0

  4. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar8:03

    xG 0.10–0.35 (23%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Middleton10:28

    xG 0.85–0.46 (65%)attempts 13–16goals 1–2

  2. Middleton – Addison3:01

    xG 0.30–0.28 (52%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba21:17

    xG 0.72–0.73 (50%)attempts 18–16goals 2–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Jost – Mittelstadt8:33

    xG 0.65–0.28 (70%)attempts 16–4goals 2–1

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs12:45

    xG 0.46–0.44 (51%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Cozens – Quinn – Peterka7:02

    xG 0.24–0.35 (40%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  4. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson15:50

    xG 0.44–0.74 (37%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBryson – Power2:28

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Samuelsson – Power2:48

    xG 0.02–0.01 (64%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Bryson – Lyubushkin6:17

    xG 0.17–0.30 (37%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.8 xGMIN 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #12 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.24 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).