Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 13, 2023·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Edmonton Oilers 7, San Jose Sharks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 73% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM212315214741
SJS090819126

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:59EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:14EDMKlim KostinGWGAssists: Zach Hyman, Vincent Desharnais · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:22EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–0
  4. P2 13:07EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsSHAssists: Mattias Janmark · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–0
  5. P2 17:55EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.15 xG5–0
  6. P3 12:14EDMJesse PuljujarviAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.13 xG6–0
  7. P3 12:46EDMRyan McLeodAssists: Dylan Holloway, Warren Foegele · Snap, 0.18 xG7–0
  8. P3 15:02SJSOskar LindblomAssists: Matt Benning, Jonah Gadjovich · Tip-in, 0.09 xG7–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:22EDMDylan Holloway: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 9:52SJSNick Cicek: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:14SJSNick Cicek: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 11:14EDMDarnell Nurse: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 13:58SJSSteven Lorentz: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:31EDMDylan Holloway: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 3:34EDMDylan Holloway: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 8:44SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
49% to win51% to win
← EDM attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSJS
41Shots on goal26
3.7Expected goals2.3
58Shot attempts51
22Faceoffs won41
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
11Hits29
13Blocked shots11
5Giveaways11
16Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Draisaitl – McDavid10:11

    xG 1.02–0.23 (82%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Foegele – McLeod – Holloway2:22

    xG 0.47–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Janmark – Kostin5:52

    xG 0.33–0.04 (90%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Foegele – Puljujarvi – McLeod6:34

    xG 0.04–0.24 (13%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouchard – Broberg9:52

    xG 0.95–0.18 (84%)attempts 13–6goals 2–0

  2. Kulak – Desharnais4:43

    xG 0.55–0.30 (64%)attempts 5–6goals 1–1

  3. Desharnais – Broberg2:18

    xG 0.22–0.15 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Meier – Eyssimont10:34

    xG 0.55–0.44 (55%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  2. Lindblom – Lorentz – Gadjovich6:52

    xG 0.24–0.36 (40%)attempts 7–6goals 1–2

  3. Bonino – Labanc – Sturm8:46

    xG 0.21–0.43 (32%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Couture – Nieto – Barabanov8:42

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Benning – Ferraro10:33

    xG 0.32–0.27 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

  2. Karlsson – Benning2:04

    xG 0.05–0.02 (69%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Megna16:51

    xG 0.84–0.84 (50%)attempts 16–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.3 xGEDM 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1177 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 73% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).