Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 14, 2023·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Buffalo Sabres 5, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11429210533
NSH15217019341

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:37BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:23NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Juuso Parssinen · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:05BUFDylan CozensAssists: JJ Peterka, Jack Quinn · Snap, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:58BUFVictor OlofssonPPAssists: Owen Power, Casey Mittelstadt · Slap, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:10NSHJeremy LauzonAssists: Cody Glass, Colton Sissons · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:50NSHRyan JohansenAssists: Dante Fabbro, Mattias Ekholm · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:43BUFKyle OkposoSHGWGAssists: Ilya Lyubushkin, Mattias Samuelsson · Tip-in, 0.15 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:49BUFJack QuinnUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:10NSHRoland McKeown: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 14:42BUFIlya Lyubushkin: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:52NSHCole Smith: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 8:19NSHFilip Forsberg: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:45BUFIlya Lyubushkin: Interference2 min
  6. P2 19:47NSHRoman Josi: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 5:57BUFTyson Jost: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Parssinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFNSH
33Shots on goal41
4.4Expected goals3.3
60Shot attempts69
29Faceoffs won34
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
14Hits36
18Blocked shots10
5Giveaways8
12Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka6:58

    xG 1.03–0.38 (73%)attempts 13–6goals 2–1

  2. Olofsson – Jost – Mittelstadt9:26

    xG 0.46–0.31 (59%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  3. Okposo – Asplund – Jost2:12

    xG 0.09–0.05 (64%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson12:25

    xG 0.95–0.91 (51%)attempts 14–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin16:42

    xG 1.22–0.49 (71%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

  2. Jokiharju – Power15:46

    xG 0.92–0.55 (62%)attempts 16–11goals 1–1

  3. Bryson – Lyubushkin8:26

    xG 0.31–0.34 (48%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Granlund – Niederreiter10:35

    xG 0.86–0.60 (59%)attempts 18–8goals 1–1

  2. Novak – Trenin – Jeannot6:27

    xG 0.33–0.33 (51%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Sissons – Glass – Smith6:56

    xG 0.15–0.28 (35%)attempts 3–9goals 1–0

  4. Duchene – Forsberg – Parssinen10:54

    xG 0.44–0.60 (42%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Ekholm3:02

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Ekholm – Fabbro12:07

    xG 0.56–0.82 (40%)attempts 11–16goals 1–1

  3. McKeown – Lauzon9:43

    xG 0.14–0.53 (21%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.3 xGBUF 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #193 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.10 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).