Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 17, 2023·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Seattle Kraken 2, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 89% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA17014110231
EDM11329212534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:11SEADaniel SprongPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Andre Burakovsky · Deflected, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:08EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:15EDMDerek RyanAssists: Vincent Desharnais, Dylan Holloway · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:30EDMWarren FoegeleGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Zach Hyman · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:22SEAVince DunnAssists: Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 1:23EDMZach HymanUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG2–4
  7. P3 9:18EDMRyan McLeodAssists: Dylan Holloway, Zach Hyman · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 1:35EDMCody Ceci: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:00EDMVincent Desharnais: Elbowing2 min
  3. P1 10:02SEAMorgan Geekie: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 17:58SEAVince Dunn: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:02EDMTyson Barrie: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 1:59SEAJared McCann: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 18:33EDMVincent Desharnais: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
49% to win51% to win
← SEA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAEDM
31Shots on goal34
2.1Expected goals4.9
54Shot attempts59
30Faceoffs won30
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
43Hits36
13Blocked shots14
12Giveaways11
15Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. Wennberg – McCann – Tanev8:10

    xG 0.10–0.23 (31%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – Burakovsky – Beniers10:53

    xG 0.49–0.85 (36%)attempts 12–14goals 0–2

  3. Donato – Sprong – Geekie5:46

    xG 0.00–0.85 (0%)attempts 1–7goals 0–2

  4. Gourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen10:16

    xG 0.36–1.22 (23%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Oleksiak6:30

    xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  2. Larsson – Oleksiak2:08

    xG 0.04–0.21 (16%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Borgen4:11

    xG 0.10–0.29 (27%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Draisaitl – McDavid6:27

    xG 1.34–0.22 (86%)attempts 6–6goals 2–0

  2. Ryan – McLeod – Holloway4:35

    xG 0.33–0.06 (85%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  3. Kane – McDavid – Ryan2:49

    xG 0.24–0.05 (83%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Hyman – Draisaitl – Foegele3:48

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouchard – Broberg12:57

    xG 2.20–0.49 (82%)attempts 15–11goals 3–0

  2. Barrie – Kulak8:34

    xG 0.46–0.14 (77%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Nurse – Desharnais4:02

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 4.9 xGSEA 2.1 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #639 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.40 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 89% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).