Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 18, 2023·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Ottawa Senators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 75% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT211131401419
OTT21811111011540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:36PITJason ZuckerAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:44OTTAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Drake Batherson, Thomas Chabot · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:44OTTTim StützlePPAssists: Brady Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:23PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Ty Smith, Sidney Crosby · Backhand, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P2 3:07PITMark FriedmanAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:19OTTDrake BathersonPPAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Thomas Chabot · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:58OTTShane PintoPPAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:33PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:25OTTBrady TkachukGWGAssists: Tim Stützle, Thomas Chabot · Snap, 0.11 xG4–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:45PITJason Zucker: Holding2 min
  2. P1 7:09PITJeff Carter: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:14OTTAustin Watson: Interference2 min
  4. P1 13:11OTTJosh Norris: Boarding2 min
  5. P1 14:04OTTDylan Gambrell: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P1 15:51PITMark Friedman: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 7:55PITKasperi Kapanen: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:44PITEvgeni Malkin: Holding2 min
  9. P2 19:19PITBryan Rust: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 19:19PITBryan Rust: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 7:31OTTJacob Bernard-Docker: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 9:10PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 11:30OTTBrady Tkachuk: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
49% to win51% to win
← PIT attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Stützle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITOTT
19Shots on goal40
3.1Expected goals4.8
42Shot attempts68
31Faceoffs won29
5Power plays9
18Penalty minutes10
34Hits23
9Blocked shots8
11Giveaways18
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Zucker – Rakell10:28

    xG 0.93–0.45 (67%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – Kapanen4:13

    xG 0.17–0.31 (35%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Blueger – O'Connor4:18

    xG 0.14–0.50 (22%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel6:41

    xG 0.31–0.68 (31%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Friedman11:09

    xG 0.74–0.66 (53%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. Ruhwedel – Joseph7:38

    xG 0.34–0.34 (50%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Dumoulin – Ruhwedel2:52

    xG 0.00–0.40 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – DeBrincat – Norris10:39

    xG 0.40–0.12 (77%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – Gambrell – Pinto4:23

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Watson – Kastelic – Kelly4:28

    xG 0.34–0.31 (52%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  4. Batherson – Tkachuk – Stützle9:20

    xG 0.63–0.75 (45%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Bernard-Docker14:00

    xG 0.99–0.39 (72%)attempts 17–7goals 0–1

  2. Hamonic – Sanderson11:19

    xG 0.78–0.63 (55%)attempts 15–8goals 0–1

  3. Holden – Brannstrom6:57

    xG 0.34–0.38 (48%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 4.8 xGPIT 3.1 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #51 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.86 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 75% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).