Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 15, 2023·Honda Center, Anaheim

Buffalo Sabres 7, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 77% of the time.

ANA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF219212313744
ANA0339010322

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:08BUFTyson JostAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Henri Jokiharju · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:58BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jeff Skinner · Slap, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:37ANAKevin ShattenkirkAssists: Trevor Zegras, Derek Grant · Snap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:48ANACam FowlerAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:08ANACam FowlerAssists: Derek Grant, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:43BUFPeyton KrebsAssists: Jack Quinn, Kale Clague · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P2 18:03BUFCasey MittelstadtGWGAssists: Peyton Krebs, Mattias Samuelsson · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 6:13BUFAlex TuchAssists: Dylan Cozens, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–3
  9. P3 11:46BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Jack Quinn, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.07 xG6–3
  10. P3 18:53BUFDylan CozensAssists: Alex Tuch, Casey Mittelstadt · Backhand, 0.10 xG7–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:46ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 14:02ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:09BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 18:09ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 18:09BUFHenri Jokiharju: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 1:44ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 4:06BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 9:18ANASimon Benoit: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 16:09BUFKale Clague: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 16:09ANARyan Strome: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 16:09ANARyan Strome: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 16:09BUFKale Clague: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 16:43ANAFrank Vatrano: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jost won the faceoff against Zegras
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFANA
44Shots on goal22
4.2Expected goals2.3
65Shot attempts43
24Faceoffs won33
5Power plays2
18Penalty minutes24
7Hits10
10Blocked shots11
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Tuch – Thompson10:44

    xG 1.40–0.33 (81%)attempts 18–9goals 0–1

  2. Mittelstadt – Krebs – Quinn8:01

    xG 0.33–0.05 (86%)attempts 6–3goals 2–0

  3. Okposo – Girgensons – Jost11:28

    xG 0.49–0.29 (63%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  4. Olofsson – Cozens – Peterka8:25

    xG 0.03–0.79 (4%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Power14:17

    xG 1.17–0.73 (61%)attempts 20–12goals 2–1

  2. Jokiharju – Dahlin13:35

    xG 0.85–0.57 (60%)attempts 15–9goals 2–1

  3. Clague – Lyubushkin10:50

    xG 0.16–0.73 (18%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Strome – Zegras9:06

    xG 0.74–0.08 (90%)attempts 10–2goals 3–0

  2. Silfverberg – Jones – Lundeström5:56

    xG 0.39–0.38 (51%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. Carrick – Megna – Leason6:21

    xG 0.12–0.30 (29%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Vatrano – McTavish5:27

    xG 0.13–0.64 (17%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Shattenkirk – Benoit13:38

    xG 0.52–0.56 (48%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  2. Kulikov – Benoit2:03

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1

  3. Kulikov – Fowler12:22

    xG 0.45–0.77 (37%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.3 xGBUF 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #206 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 77% of the time.

ANA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).