Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 16, 2023·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 69% of the time.

SEA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI010929219
SEA21238110630

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:01SEAJared McCannSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:39SEAYanni GourdeAssists: Justin Schultz, Eeli Tolvanen · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:52SEAJustin SchultzPPGWGAssists: Matty Beniers, Jordan Eberle · Slap, 0.03 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:26SEAOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Yanni Gourde, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–4
  5. P2 14:43SEAYanni GourdePPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Jordan Eberle · Slap, 0.12 xG0–5
  6. P3 0:14PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Noah Cates, Ivan Provorov · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 10:37SEAMatty BeniersUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–6
  8. P3 14:11PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Noah Cates · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:23SEARyan Donato: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 5:51PHIWade Allison: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 13:24SEAJamie Oleksiak: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:24PHINicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 4:21PHIScott Laughton: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:09PHIPatrick Brown: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 0:00SEARyan Donato: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 0:00SEARyan Donato: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
49% to win51% to win
← PHI attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Frost
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHISEA
19Shots on goal30
1.8Expected goals2.8
51Shot attempts61
36Faceoffs won23
1Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
18Hits11
19Blocked shots19
5Giveaways8
11Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDeslauriers – Konecny – Cates4:51

    xG 0.63–0.10 (86%)attempts 10–5goals 2–1

  2. van Riemsdyk – Brown – Konecny3:20

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Konecny – Frost4:14

    xG 0.17–0.08 (68%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Deslauriers – Tippett – Cates2:29

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRistolainen – Sanheim14:08

    xG 0.52–0.13 (80%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Provorov – York16:57

    xG 0.47–0.70 (40%)attempts 11–14goals 1–2

  3. Seeler – DeAngelo14:58

    xG 0.60–0.84 (42%)attempts 15–19goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Wennberg – Tanev10:35

    xG 0.20–0.10 (68%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – McCann – Beniers10:23

    xG 0.38–0.39 (49%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

  3. Hayden – Donato – Geekie12:22

    xG 0.53–0.56 (48%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen11:27

    xG 0.42–0.60 (41%)attempts 12–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn18:14

    xG 0.77–0.60 (56%)attempts 16–17goals 0–1

  2. Schultz – Soucy14:29

    xG 0.44–0.46 (49%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  3. Oleksiak – Borgen14:06

    xG 0.45–0.77 (37%)attempts 12–21goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.8 xGPHI 1.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #1087 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 69% of the time.

SEA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).