Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 7, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 82% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CBJ310190800427
PIT0711631816547

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:02CBJEmil BemstromPPAssists: Cole Sillinger, Kent Johnson · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:54CBJLane PedersonAssists: Liam Foudy · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P1 10:11CBJPatrik LaineAssists: Jack Roslovic, Kent Johnson · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–0
  4. P2 2:37CBJLiam FoudyAssists: Emil Bemstrom · Snap, 0.08 xG4–0
  5. P2 10:23PITJason ZuckerAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Alex Nylander · Backhand, 0.13 xG4–1
  6. P3 0:21PITJake GuentzelAssists: Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 3:16PITJason ZuckerAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–3
  8. P3 3:59PITDanton HeinenAssists: Rickard Rakell, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:45PITSidney CrosbyPPGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.21 xG4–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 2:16PITJan Rutta: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 16:08CBJPatrik Laine: Hooking2 min
  3. P3 12:29PITDrew O'Connor: Interference2 min
  4. OT 1:13CBJBoone Jenner: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
49% to win51% to win
← CBJ attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Jenner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPIT
27Shots on goal47
2.7Expected goals5.0
48Shot attempts98
33Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
43Hits51
28Blocked shots10
15Giveaways4
13Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestPederson – Bemstrom – Foudy7:55

    xG 0.73–0.37 (67%)attempts 9–13goals 2–0

  2. Olivier – Robinson – Sillinger10:57

    xG 0.11–0.57 (16%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1

  3. Roslovic – Laine – Johnson13:26

    xG 0.54–1.26 (30%)attempts 10–21goals 1–2

  4. Gaudreau – Jenner – Marchenko13:14

    xG 0.33–1.30 (20%)attempts 8–30goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPeeke – Bayreuther4:08

    xG 0.59–0.10 (86%)attempts 6–3goals 2–0

  2. Peeke – Boqvist2:46

    xG 0.15–0.08 (66%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Bayreuther – Blankenburg3:59

    xG 0.08–0.10 (42%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rakell – Guentzel17:38

    xG 1.32–0.39 (77%)attempts 33–10goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Zucker – Nylander8:52

    xG 0.75–0.19 (80%)attempts 18–6goals 2–0

  3. Carter – Heinen – O'Connor6:14

    xG 0.45–0.07 (86%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Nylander – O'Connor2:26

    xG 0.50–0.19 (72%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Dumoulin9:56

    xG 0.94–0.10 (90%)attempts 19–3goals 2–0

  2. Letang – Pettersson11:19

    xG 0.84–0.58 (59%)attempts 12–9goals 2–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin7:12

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 5.0 xGCBJ 2.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #146 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.75 · 8 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 82% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).