Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 1, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Boston Bruins 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS112112211435
PIT1401228324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:20BOSCharlie McAvoyPPAssists: Pavel Zacha, Tyler Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:33PITBryan RustAssists: Sidney Crosby, Mark Friedman · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:41BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Dmitry Orlov · Tip-in, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:09PITBryan RustUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:07BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Pavel Zacha, Matt Grzelcyk · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:30PITJake GuentzelAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Bryan Rust · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:34BOSDavid PastrnakGWGAssists: David Krejci, Pavel Zacha · Snap, 0.10 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:21PITChad Ruhwedel: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:35PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 17:15BOSDavid Krejci: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 19:56PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:55BOSJake DeBrusk: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 17:10BOSBrandon Carlo: Interference2 min
  7. P3 12:30BOSJakub Lauko: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  8. P3 15:12BOSDavid Krejci: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 19:03BOSDavid Pastrnak: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
49% to win51% to win
← BOS attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSPIT
35Shots on goal24
3.0Expected goals3.6
66Shot attempts55
26Faceoffs won31
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
29Hits38
15Blocked shots18
6Giveaways15
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchand – Zacha – DeBrusk8:37

    xG 0.55–0.00 (99%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Nosek – Greer – Lauko6:15

    xG 0.08–0.17 (31%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Coyle – Hathaway – Frederic9:30

    xG 0.06–0.37 (15%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

  4. Krejci – Bertuzzi – Pastrnak10:35

    xG 0.60–1.37 (30%)attempts 13–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Clifton10:31

    xG 0.36–0.27 (57%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  2. Lindholm – Carlo11:55

    xG 0.35–0.30 (54%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

  3. Orlov – Carlo2:08

    xG 0.00–0.05 (2%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel11:52

    xG 0.84–0.41 (68%)attempts 10–17goals 3–0

  2. Granlund – Heinen – Poehling6:20

    xG 0.36–0.17 (67%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  3. Carter – Archibald – O'Connor5:36

    xG 0.12–0.22 (36%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Zucker – Rakell8:49

    xG 0.41–0.57 (42%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin13:11

    xG 0.97–0.60 (62%)attempts 14–20goals 2–1

  2. Ruhwedel – Friedman8:03

    xG 0.45–0.20 (69%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  3. Petry – Joseph12:05

    xG 0.07–0.71 (8%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.6 xGBOS 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #124 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.68 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).