Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 8, 2023·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Carolina Hurricanes 3, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

BUF winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR212110012334
BUF16212112430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:00BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Jeff Skinner, Rasmus Dahlin · Backhand, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:34CARSeth JarvisAssists: Jesperi Kotkaniemi · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:56CARJesper FastAssists: Jordan Staal, Jordan Martinook · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:04BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:04CARSebastian AhoAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Jesse Puljujarvi · Snap, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:18BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Owen Power · Snap, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:15BUFTage ThompsonGWGAssists: Dylan Cozens · Snap, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 6:09CARShayne Gostisbehere: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:43CARJesperi Kotkaniemi: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 18:51BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 3:36CARJalen Chatfield: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 4:04CARMartin Necas: Unsportsmanlike conduct bench2 min
  6. P3 15:30BUFJeff Skinner: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← CAR attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Krebs
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARBUF
34Shots on goal30
3.9Expected goals2.9
70Shot attempts46
32Faceoffs won24
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
20Hits25
5Blocked shots15
8Giveaways10
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestTeravainen – Aho – Puljujarvi11:50

    xG 1.29–0.93 (58%)attempts 20–17goals 1–1

  2. Necas – Kotkaniemi – Jarvis11:08

    xG 0.98–0.64 (60%)attempts 14–10goals 1–1

  3. Stastny – Stepan – Drury5:07

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Fast – Martinook9:33

    xG 0.73–0.62 (54%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Slavin16:21

    xG 1.21–0.73 (63%)attempts 26–15goals 0–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Chatfield12:08

    xG 0.91–0.47 (66%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  3. Skjei – Pesce15:15

    xG 0.82–1.09 (43%)attempts 16–20goals 1–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Girgensons – Krebs9:59

    xG 0.62–0.49 (56%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  2. Skinner – Tuch – Mittelstadt11:54

    xG 0.83–0.78 (52%)attempts 15–13goals 2–0

  3. Jost – Quinn – Peterka3:59

    xG 0.00–0.39 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–2

  4. Greenway – Thompson – Cozens8:49

    xG 0.26–0.88 (23%)attempts 7–19goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Power9:04

    xG 0.92–0.47 (66%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0

  2. Stillman – Jokiharju2:08

    xG 0.29–0.05 (85%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Samuelsson8:41

    xG 0.60–0.70 (46%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.9 xGCAR 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #332 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.06 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

BUF winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).