Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 2, 2023·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Dallas Stars 4, Edmonton Oilers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 84% of the time.

EDM winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL192919427
EDM113011225349

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:08DALMatt DucheneAssists: Mason Marchment, Esa Lindell · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:00EDMEvander KaneAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Snap, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:25DALJoe PavelskiAssists: Roope Hintz, Miro Heiskanen · Slap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:06DALRoope HintzPPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Jamie Benn · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P3 2:37DALRoope HintzGWGAssists: Joe Pavelski, Jason Robertson · Slap, 0.34 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:35EDMSam GagnerAssists: Cody Ceci, Brett Kulak · Poke, 0.02 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:36EDMSam GagnerAssists: Evander Kane · Backhand, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 6:17DALCraig Smith: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 13:16DALMason Marchment: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 15:45EDMEvander Kane: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:54DALMason Marchment: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P3 6:31EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Holding2 min
  6. P3 8:05DALMason Marchment: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← DAL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Pavelski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALEDM
27Shots on goal49
2.7Expected goals5.3
42Shot attempts98
29Faceoffs won44
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
21Hits24
25Blocked shots13
24Giveaways12
11Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. Benn – Dadonov – Johnston9:02

    xG 0.63–0.62 (50%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Duchene – Seguin – Marchment10:24

    xG 0.36–0.59 (37%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1

  3. Pavelski – Hintz – Robertson13:13

    xG 0.49–0.74 (40%)attempts 8–21goals 1–1

  4. Smith – Steel – Dellandrea6:35

    xG 0.28–0.54 (34%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHakanpää – Lindell2:06

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Lindell – Lundkvist10:32

    xG 0.62–0.81 (43%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

  3. Hakanpää – Harley11:11

    xG 0.73–0.95 (44%)attempts 12–17goals 1–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins9:41

    xG 1.21–0.66 (65%)attempts 16–12goals 1–2

  2. Gagner – McLeod – Holloway4:48

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid3:31

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  4. Gagner – Kane – Nugent-Hopkins3:00

    xG 0.18–0.13 (57%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard14:16

    xG 0.93–0.46 (67%)attempts 19–9goals 2–1

  2. Nurse – Desharnais2:10

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Ceci – Nurse9:03

    xG 0.53–0.40 (57%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 5.3 xGDAL 2.7 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #455 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 84% of the time.

EDM winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).