Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 10, 2023·Honda Center, Anaheim

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

ANA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI21717312636
ANA01511528338

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:57PHISean CouturierAssists: Cam Atkinson, Egor Zamula · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:31PHICam AtkinsonAssists: Travis Sanheim, Tyson Foerster · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:33PHILouie BelpedioAssists: Joel Farabee · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–0
  4. P2 13:15ANALeo CarlssonPPAssists: Alex Killorn, Mason McTavish · Snap, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:39PHITravis SanheimGWGAssists: Joel Farabee, Cam York · Backhand, 0.23 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:34ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Alex Killorn, Pavel Mintyukov · Snap, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:07PHIOwen TippettAssists: Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–2
  8. P3 18:32ANALeo CarlssonPPAssists: Troy Terry, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:59PHIOwen TippettENAssists: Travis Sanheim, Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.69 xG6–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:11ANAIlya Lyubushkin: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:02PHISean Couturier: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 10:33ANARadko Gudas: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 11:34PHICam Atkinson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 13:48PHIMorgan Frost: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 16:46PHICam York: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 1:39PHIEgor Zamula: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 3:56ANALukas Dostal: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 16:37PHIScott Laughton: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Henrique won the faceoff against Laughton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIANA
36Shots on goal38
3.9Expected goals3.9
58Shot attempts78
31Faceoffs won32
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
13Hits18
21Blocked shots9
7Giveaways12
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Couturier – Foerster8:21

    xG 0.97–0.42 (70%)attempts 12–8goals 2–0

  2. Konecny – Tippett – Frost7:06

    xG 0.51–0.27 (65%)attempts 13–3goals 1–1

  3. Cates – Farabee – Brink4:18

    xG 0.22–0.10 (69%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Laughton – Farabee – Brink3:47

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Walker12:41

    xG 0.90–0.23 (79%)attempts 22–9goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – York14:07

    xG 0.97–0.58 (62%)attempts 7–17goals 2–0

  3. Belpedio – Zamula10:35

    xG 0.50–0.63 (44%)attempts 15–8goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Terry – Carlsson12:46

    xG 0.58–0.20 (74%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  2. Carrick – Johnston – Leason8:15

    xG 0.19–0.33 (36%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Silfverberg – Jones7:57

    xG 0.34–0.50 (40%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  4. Strome – Vatrano – McTavish9:41

    xG 0.47–1.10 (30%)attempts 10–17goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – LaCombe13:41

    xG 0.38–0.45 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Lyubushkin – Mintyukov8:35

    xG 0.45–0.74 (38%)attempts 9–15goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Vaakanainen14:39

    xG 0.25–0.61 (29%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.9 xGPHI 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #394 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

ANA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).