Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 2, 2023·Honda Center, Anaheim

Colorado Avalanche 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL31409012020337
ANA11421008051437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:36COLBowen ByramAssists: Miles Wood, Ross Colton · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:59COLBowen ByramAssists: Fredrik Olofsson, Josh Manson · Snap, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:05ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Ryan Strome, Frank Vatrano · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:17COLDevon ToewsAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:58ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:22ANAAlex KillornPPAssists: Leo Carlsson, Pavel Mintyukov · Snap, 0.10 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. COL Jonathan Drouin stopped
  2. 2. ANA Alex Killorn stopped
  3. 3. COL Nathan MacKinnon stopped
  4. 4. ANA Leo Carlsson scored
  5. 5. COL Mikko Rantanen stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:00ANABo Groulx: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 12:57COLJosh Manson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:59ANARadko Gudas: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 8:23COLCaleb Jones: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:15ANABo Groulx: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 3:31COLRoss Colton: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Colton won the faceoff against Carrick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLANA
37Shots on goal37
3.9Expected goals3.7
74Shot attempts63
31Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
20Hits25
13Blocked shots21
13Giveaways20
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestWood – MacKinnon – Rantanen2:14

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. MacKinnon – Nichushkin – Rantanen15:53

    xG 0.88–0.68 (56%)attempts 20–13goals 1–0

  3. Wood – Colton – O'Connor7:59

    xG 0.45–0.44 (51%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  4. Tatar – Johansen – Drouin5:43

    xG 0.09–0.19 (31%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar11:23

    xG 0.60–0.13 (83%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Manson3:47

    xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Makar – Byram3:13

    xG 0.19–0.13 (61%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Jones – Groulx4:16

    xG 0.39–0.07 (85%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  2. Henrique – Jones – Leason2:52

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Terry – Carlsson13:18

    xG 0.63–0.69 (48%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  4. Carrick – McGinn – Leason8:12

    xG 0.32–0.45 (41%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Lyubushkin – Mintyukov12:09

    xG 0.48–0.43 (53%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  2. Fowler – LaCombe15:46

    xG 0.64–0.75 (46%)attempts 12–21goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Vaakanainen14:09

    xG 0.51–0.73 (41%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.7 xGCOL 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #358 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.88 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).