Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 23, 2023·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Ottawa Senators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT171422300434
OTT2102110411526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:07OTTJakob ChychrunAssists: Claude Giroux, Josh Norris · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:31PITLars EllerPPAssists: Reilly Smith, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:01OTTJosh NorrisAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Erik Brannstrom · Bat, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:10OTTBrady TkachukAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakob Chychrun · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:59PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby, Reilly Smith · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 7:30OTTErik BrannstromAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Jake Sanderson · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 1:51PITDrew O'ConnorAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:34PITKris LetangAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:10OTTTim StützleGWGAssists: Drake Batherson · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:03OTTRidly Greig: Interference2 min
  2. P1 2:25OTTBrady Tkachuk: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 8:04PITJohn Ludvig: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 12:55OTTJake Sanderson: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:00PITRyan Graves: Holding2 min
  6. P1 19:36OTTClaude Giroux: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 2:34PITJohn Ludvig: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 5:18OTTErik Brannstrom: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 7:30PITJansen Harkins: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  10. P2 15:12OTTErik Brannstrom: Interference2 min
  11. P3 12:37OTTTravis Hamonic: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Norris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITOTT
34Shots on goal26
3.3Expected goals2.5
77Shot attempts50
36Faceoffs won25
7Power plays4
8Penalty minutes14
16Hits16
11Blocked shots28
10Giveaways13
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rakell – Guentzel11:43

    xG 0.95–0.21 (82%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Harkins – Acciari4:10

    xG 0.42–0.13 (76%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Eller – Smith – Puustinen4:35

    xG 0.30–0.06 (84%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – O'Connor – Zohorna4:36

    xG 0.17–0.01 (95%)attempts 7–2goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Graves12:02

    xG 0.72–0.06 (92%)attempts 23–6goals 0–0

  2. Ruhwedel – Ludvig5:26

    xG 0.15–0.14 (53%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Pettersson16:19

    xG 0.75–0.81 (48%)attempts 17–16goals 2–2

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Kubalik – Crookshank – Greig3:13

    xG 0.19–0.19 (51%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  2. Kastelic – Kelly – Smejkal3:06

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Kubalik – Kelly – Greig2:26

    xG 0.02–0.04 (33%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Norris – Tkachuk9:12

    xG 0.71–0.86 (45%)attempts 9–15goals 3–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrannstrom – Bernard-Docker8:22

    xG 0.41–0.24 (62%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  2. Hamonic – Chychrun14:10

    xG 0.49–0.84 (37%)attempts 10–17goals 2–0

  3. Sanderson – Zub11:38

    xG 0.36–0.85 (30%)attempts 10–21goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.5 xGPIT 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #58 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.53 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).