Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 23, 2023·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 5, St. Louis Blues 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 77% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI2821012520
STL11119522742

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:04STLRobert ThomasAssists: Pavel Buchnevich · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:49CHIConnor BedardAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Isaak Phillips · Cradle, 0.36 xG1–1
  3. P1 4:12CHIAnthony BeauvillierAssists: Jarred Tinordi, Taylor Raddysh · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:20CHINick FolignoPPAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Taylor Raddysh · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:29STLColton ParaykoAssists: Sammy Blais, Mackenzie MacEachern · Slap, 0.01 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:54CHIJason DickinsonAssists: Taylor Raddysh, Jarred Tinordi · Tip-in, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 5:16CHINick FolignoSHAssists: Jarred Tinordi · Backhand, 0.20 xG5–2
  8. P3 7:53STLBrandon SaadPPAssists: Kevin Hayes, Scott Perunovich · Tip-in, 0.04 xG5–3
  9. P3 10:43STLJake NeighboursPPAssists: Justin Faulk, Kevin Hayes · Deflected, 0.13 xG5–4
  10. P3 11:06STLJordan KyrouAssists: Robert Thomas, Pavel Buchnevich · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–5
  11. P3 17:53STLJustin FaulkGWGAssists: Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.01 xG5–6
  12. P3 18:59STLJordan KyrouENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.78 xG5–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 15:28CHIJarred Tinordi: Interference2 min
  2. P1 18:49STLRobert Thomas: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:17STLJustin Faulk: Holding2 min
  4. P3 4:36CHILouis Crevier: Holding2 min
  5. P3 6:04CHIConnor Murphy: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 10:13CHIJarred Tinordi: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Bedard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
20Shots on goal42
2.4Expected goals4.1
48Shot attempts67
23Faceoffs won35
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
36Hits21
13Blocked shots12
7Giveaways9
12Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestGuttman – Johnson – Reichel5:58

    xG 0.20–0.00 (99%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  2. Dickinson – Beauvillier – Raddysh11:36

    xG 0.43–0.31 (58%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  3. Foligno – Kurashev – Bedard10:47

    xG 0.20–0.42 (32%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

  4. Blackwell – Donato – Entwistle9:34

    xG 0.11–0.79 (13%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTinordi – Crevier12:20

    xG 0.73–0.35 (68%)attempts 10–12goals 3–2

  2. Crevier – Korchinski2:37

    xG 0.01–0.03 (35%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Zaitsev – Korchinski12:23

    xG 0.46–0.56 (45%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBuchnevich – Kyrou – Thomas15:22

    xG 1.28–0.76 (63%)attempts 27–7goals 2–2

  2. Hayes – Saad – Toropchenko8:04

    xG 0.55–0.41 (57%)attempts 6–15goals 0–1

  3. Sundqvist – MacEachern – Blais6:35

    xG 0.03–0.09 (25%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  4. Schenn – Kapanen – Neighbours10:37

    xG 0.30–0.40 (43%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeddy – Parayko18:02

    xG 1.22–0.37 (77%)attempts 23–14goals 2–1

  2. Scandella – Perunovich10:49

    xG 0.22–0.23 (49%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Faulk – Krug14:01

    xG 0.63–0.83 (43%)attempts 14–10goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 4.1 xGCHI 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #13 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.33 · 12 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 77% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).