Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 11, 2024·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Anaheim Ducks 3, Carolina Hurricanes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 70% of the time.

CAR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0131203316
CAR2163919634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:00CARBrady SkjeiAssists: Seth Jarvis, Jordan Staal · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:15CARAndrei SvechnikovAssists: Sebastian Aho, Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:25ANAIsac LundeströmAssists: Brett Leason, Brock McGinn · Snap, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:57CARJordan MartinookAssists: Seth Jarvis · Snap, 0.29 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:06ANARyan StromeAssists: Troy Terry · Bat, 0.20 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:53ANAFrank VatranoPPAssists: Adam Henrique · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P2 14:30CARStefan NoesenGWGAssists: Michael Bunting, Jesperi Kotkaniemi · Backhand, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P2 16:41CARJack DruryPPAssists: Stefan Noesen, Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.23 xG3–5
  9. P3 9:54CARSeth JarvisAssists: Brent Burns, Jordan Martinook · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–6
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 11:03ANAUrho Vaakanainen: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 5:19ANARobert Hagg: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:19ANARobert Hagg: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 5:19CARJordan Martinook: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 10:50CARPyotr Kochetkov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:41CARJordan Staal: Interference2 min
  7. P2 14:44ANASam Carrick: Boarding2 min · PPG
  8. P2 14:44CARBrendan Lemieux: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 14:44ANASam Carrick: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 5:31CARJordan Martinook: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 10:33CARJalen Chatfield: Holding2 min
  12. P3 18:25CARJack Drury: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundeström won the faceoff against Kotkaniemi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACAR
16Shots on goal34
2.4Expected goals3.5
38Shot attempts61
30Faceoffs won29
5Power plays3
13Penalty minutes17
22Hits24
15Blocked shots10
2Giveaways6
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMcGinn – Lundeström – Leason9:38

    xG 0.65–0.40 (62%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. Henrique – Strome – Terry9:48

    xG 0.41–0.40 (51%)attempts 6–10goals 1–1

  3. Silfverberg – Carrick – Groulx6:49

    xG 0.00–0.03 (3%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Vatrano – McTavish9:32

    xG 0.19–0.85 (19%)attempts 5–10goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – LaCombe13:15

    xG 0.92–0.50 (65%)attempts 14–11goals 2–1

  2. Hagg – Lyubushkin11:04

    xG 0.06–0.23 (20%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Vaakanainen15:02

    xG 0.42–0.71 (37%)attempts 5–16goals 0–2

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Martinook – Jarvis8:11

    xG 0.85–0.04 (96%)attempts 10–4goals 3–0

  2. Teravainen – Aho – Svechnikov10:40

    xG 0.47–0.38 (55%)attempts 10–6goals 1–1

  3. Fast – Lemieux – Drury6:26

    xG 0.03–0.00 (97%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Noesen – Bunting – Kotkaniemi10:54

    xG 0.53–1.17 (31%)attempts 12–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkjei – Pesce13:27

    xG 0.60–0.31 (66%)attempts 13–4goals 2–1

  2. Orlov – Chatfield13:09

    xG 0.62–0.53 (54%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  3. Burns – Slavin13:45

    xG 0.37–0.66 (36%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.5 xGANA 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #264 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.63 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 70% of the time.

CAR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).