Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 14, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Florida Panthers 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0441217523
PIT03111113227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:28FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Gustav Forsling · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:02FLAJonah GadjovichAssists: Brandon Montour, Kevin Stenlund · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:27FLAAaron EkbladPPGWGAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P2 13:02FLAAnton LundellAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Nick Cousins · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–0
  5. P2 15:24PITBryan RustAssists: Jake Guentzel, Chad Ruhwedel · Deflected, 0.13 xG4–1
  6. P3 5:35FLAAnton LundellAssists: Eetu Luostarinen · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–1
  7. P3 6:07PITJohn LudvigAssists: Drew O'Connor, Lars Eller · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:56FLARyan Lomberg: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 17:14FLAOliver Ekman-Larsson: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 0:00FLAOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 0:00PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 2:22FLAEvan Rodrigues: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 6:45PITMarcus Pettersson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:24FLARyan Lomberg: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  8. P2 17:47PITKris Letang: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAPIT
23Shots on goal27
2.6Expected goals2.6
52Shot attempts57
25Faceoffs won27
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
20Hits20
15Blocked shots16
1Giveaways6
2Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart13:09

    xG 0.85–0.54 (61%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

  2. Rodrigues – Luostarinen – Lundell9:38

    xG 0.24–0.08 (75%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  3. Stenlund – Lomberg – Gadjovich4:11

    xG 0.09–0.15 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

  4. Cousins – Bennett – Tkachuk9:10

    xG 0.22–0.59 (27%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling12:58

    xG 1.10–0.41 (73%)attempts 17–10goals 2–1

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Kulikov6:49

    xG 0.20–0.01 (93%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – Montour3:51

    xG 0.08–0.00 (96%)attempts 1–5goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Eller – White2:29

    xG 0.24–0.10 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Eller – Rakell – O'Connor5:44

    xG 0.06–0.13 (32%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Malkin – Smith – Puljujarvi9:45

    xG 0.33–0.40 (45%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Rakell3:09

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Ludvig4:52

    xG 0.49–0.05 (90%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Joseph3:15

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Ruhwedel – Graves2:58

    xG 0.13–0.02 (86%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.6 xGFLA 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #1000 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.83 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).