Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 21, 2024·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Boston Bruins 6, Edmonton Oilers 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BOS1143911013636
EDM11211031802542

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:34BOSMorgan GeekiePPAssists: Mason Lohrei, Charlie Coyle · Snap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:40EDMWarren FoegeleAssists: Connor McDavid · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:25BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Danton Heinen, Mason Lohrei · Snap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:40BOSTrent FredericAssists: Jesper Boqvist, Charlie McAvoy · Tip-in, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:57BOSJake DeBruskAssists: David Pastrnak, Parker Wotherspoon · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–1
  6. P2 15:27EDMWarren FoegeleAssists: Zach Hyman, Brett Kulak · Backhand, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P3 6:14EDMMattias JanmarkAssists: Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:24EDMCorey PerryAssists: Darnell Nurse, Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–4
  9. P3 12:41BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Mason Lohrei · Snap, 0.16 xG5–4
  10. P3 13:23EDMZach HymanAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–5
  11. OT 3:10BOSCharlie McAvoyGWGAssists: Jake DeBrusk, Pavel Zacha · Backhand, 0.14 xG6–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 1:05EDMRyan McLeod: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 17:27BOSAnthony Richard: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 6:20EDMCorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 6:20BOSParker Wotherspoon: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 6:20EDMCorey Perry: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 10:09BOSMorgan Geekie: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 19:39BOSJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSEDM
36Shots on goal42
4.6Expected goals4.5
62Shot attempts93
37Faceoffs won34
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
32Hits23
24Blocked shots9
14Giveaways16
10Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestFrederic – Brazeau – Boqvist6:13

    xG 0.28–0.20 (58%)attempts 7–4goals 1–1

  2. Pastrnak – Zacha – DeBrusk15:07

    xG 1.30–1.28 (50%)attempts 17–30goals 1–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Richard – Geekie8:17

    xG 0.24–0.25 (49%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  4. Marchand – Coyle – Heinen10:05

    xG 0.77–0.99 (44%)attempts 9–18goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestForbort – Lohrei2:58

    xG 0.61–0.10 (86%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Forbort – Wotherspoon2:58

    xG 0.43–0.03 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Carlo – Wotherspoon6:06

    xG 0.24–0.12 (66%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Foegele – McDavid13:39

    xG 1.96–0.45 (81%)attempts 37–8goals 3–0

  2. Gagner – Brown – Ryan2:18

    xG 0.14–0.01 (95%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Kane – Draisaitl5:29

    xG 0.21–0.25 (46%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  4. Perry – Janmark – Holloway3:59

    xG 0.05–0.13 (28%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard19:22

    xG 2.22–0.49 (82%)attempts 45–10goals 2–0

  2. Kulak – Desharnais11:12

    xG 0.32–0.68 (32%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  3. Ceci – Nurse17:43

    xG 0.92–2.05 (31%)attempts 15–26goals 2–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 4.5 xGBOS 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #2 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.86 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).