Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 14, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

San Jose Sharks 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS29110013332
PIT11021734631

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:28PITNoel AcciariAssists: Erik Karlsson, Drew O'Connor · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:31SJSFabian ZetterlundAssists: Calen Addison, Henry Thrun · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:01SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: Klim Kostin, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:11PITJeff CarterAssists: Emil Bemstrom · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:34PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Drew O'Connor, Lars Eller · Backhand, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:42SJSKlim KostinAssists: Mikael Granlund, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:38PITJohn LudvigGWGAssists: Pierre-Olivier Joseph, Reilly Smith · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:38PITRickard RakellAssists: Pierre-Olivier Joseph, John Ludvig · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:04PITBryan RustENAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.72 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:41PITBryan Rust: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 8:06SJSFilip Zadina: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:17SJSCalen Addison: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 0:37PITMichael Bunting: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 0:37SJSKyle Burroughs: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 7:02PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSPIT
32Shots on goal31
2.6Expected goals3.1
75Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won36
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
27Hits23
20Blocked shots20
4Giveaways9
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Zetterlund – Barabanov13:31

    xG 1.04–0.35 (75%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0

  2. Kunin – Zadina – Eklund11:09

    xG 0.50–0.41 (55%)attempts 11–13goals 0–2

  3. Bailey – Carpenter – Labanc2:32

    xG 0.08–0.06 (57%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  4. Kostin – Sturm – Bordeleau7:12

    xG 0.33–0.41 (44%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAddison – Thrun5:45

    xG 0.71–0.04 (95%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Vlasic – Thrun2:44

    xG 0.31–0.14 (69%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  3. Vlasic – Burroughs7:30

    xG 0.27–0.09 (74%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Acciari – Bemstrom7:44

    xG 0.45–0.22 (67%)attempts 8–19goals 1–0

  2. Eller – Smith – Puustinen7:05

    xG 0.21–0.08 (72%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – O'Connor3:30

    xG 0.25–0.17 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Rakell – Bunting3:17

    xG 0.07–0.20 (25%)attempts 2–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGraves – Ludvig2:04

    xG 0.39–0.03 (93%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Pettersson14:25

    xG 0.55–0.32 (63%)attempts 16–18goals 1–1

  3. Karlsson – Joseph2:09

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.1 xGSJS 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #286 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).