Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 16, 2024·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Minnesota Wild 2, St. Louis Blues 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 72% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN060828021224
STL011112113012337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:49STLJordan KyrouPPAssists: Jake Neighbours, Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P3 0:27STLBrayden SchennAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:10MINMarco RossiAssists: Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P3 16:01MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Zach Bogosian · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Robert Thomas stopped
  2. 2. MIN Mats Zuccarello stopped
  3. 3. STL Jake Neighbours stopped
  4. 4. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  5. 5. STL Brayden Schenn scored
  6. 6. MIN Matt Boldy scored
  7. 7. STL Jordan Kyrou scored
  8. 8. MIN Frederick Gaudreau stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:05STLKasperi Kapanen: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:05MINRyan Hartman: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 4:49MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:08MINZach Bogosian: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 2:37STLNathan Walker: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 2:37MINMason Shaw: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 13:02STLBrandon Saad: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 13:02MINZach Bogosian: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSTL
24Shots on goal37
1.6Expected goals2.7
63Shot attempts68
21Faceoffs won36
0Power plays2
13Penalty minutes9
14Hits22
17Blocked shots31
9Giveaways11
11Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi4:32

    xG 0.25–0.22 (52%)attempts 7–4goals 2–0

  2. Johansson – Zuccarello – Rossi10:20

    xG 0.20–0.30 (40%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0

  3. Hartman – Kaprizov – Boldy10:52

    xG 0.31–0.44 (41%)attempts 10–16goals 0–1

  4. Johansson – Hartman – Boldy5:02

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Merrill – Chisholm12:27

    xG 0.14–0.17 (45%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Middleton – Faber17:26

    xG 0.27–0.48 (36%)attempts 17–23goals 0–1

  3. Bogosian – Brodin17:55

    xG 0.91–1.48 (38%)attempts 22–25goals 2–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Saad – Kapanen10:49

    xG 0.60–0.22 (73%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Sundqvist – Walker – Toropchenko6:58

    xG 0.21–0.08 (72%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Buchnevich – Neighbours – Bolduc8:11

    xG 0.25–0.16 (61%)attempts 13–4goals 0–1

  4. Schenn – Kyrou – Thomas12:14

    xG 0.64–0.92 (41%)attempts 16–23goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeddy – Parayko19:25

    xG 0.62–0.34 (65%)attempts 20–22goals 1–1

  2. Faulk – Perunovich12:15

    xG 0.82–0.56 (59%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

  3. Faulk – Krug3:08

    xG 0.24–0.06 (80%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.7 xGMIN 1.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #513 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.57 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 72% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).