Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 30, 2024·Ball Arena, Denver

Nashville Predators 4, Colorado Avalanche 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 77% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH31211409435
COL216312214742

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:41NSHCole SmithAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Michael McCarron · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:25COLJonathan DrouinAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:02NSHMark JankowskiAssists: Tommy Novak · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P1 13:43NSHDante FabbroAssists: Jason Zucker, Kiefer Sherwood · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P1 16:11COLCasey MittelstadtPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Poke, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 0:57NSHGustav NyquistAssists: Spencer Stastney, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P2 5:43COLArtturi LehkonenPPAssists: Cale Makar, Jonathan Drouin · Slap, 0.07 xG4–3
  8. P2 18:25COLCale MakarPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P2 19:31COLYakov TreninGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–5
  10. P3 3:38COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Josh Manson, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–6
  11. P3 16:10COLNathan MacKinnonENAssists: Mikko Rantanen · Backhand, 0.45 xG4–7
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:16COLNathan MacKinnon: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 10:08COLMiles Wood: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 10:34NSHRyan O'Reilly: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 15:54NSHKiefer Sherwood: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 0:57COLAlexandar Georgiev: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 3:11NSHRyan McDonagh: Match penalty5 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:34COLMiles Wood: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:44NSHColton Sissons: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:54NSHLuke Schenn: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 18:06COLArtturi Lehkonen: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00McCarron won the faceoff against Trenin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
35Shots on goal42
2.8Expected goals4.5
65Shot attempts76
32Faceoffs won36
5Power plays6
13Penalty minutes10
21Hits25
21Blocked shots18
2Giveaways8
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Sissons – Glass4:34

    xG 0.58–0.11 (85%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Nyquist – O'Reilly – Forsberg8:19

    xG 0.48–0.38 (56%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

  3. Jankowski – Novak – Evangelista6:11

    xG 0.38–0.66 (36%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  4. McCarron – Sherwood – Smith5:55

    xG 0.00–0.51 (0%)attempts 2–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Stastney5:07

    xG 0.71–0.07 (91%)attempts 17–2goals 0–0

  2. Lauzon – Stastney4:28

    xG 0.45–0.21 (69%)attempts 3–8goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Stastney5:11

    xG 0.26–0.12 (69%)attempts 4–4goals 2–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestParise – Wood – Colton5:53

    xG 0.66–0.28 (70%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. MacKinnon – Drouin – Rantanen10:10

    xG 0.62–0.36 (64%)attempts 19–9goals 2–1

  3. Cogliano – Trenin – Duhaime3:01

    xG 0.33–0.46 (42%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Lehkonen – Duhaime – Mittelstadt6:22

    xG 0.12–0.26 (31%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Toews2:42

    xG 0.48–0.23 (67%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Manson3:08

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Makar2:01

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.5 xGNSH 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #97 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.08 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 77% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).