Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 7, 2024·Honda Center, Anaheim

St. Louis Blues 6, Anaheim Ducks 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL21021117031631
ANA11511237040538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:11STLZachary BolducAssists: Robert Thomas, Colton Parayko · Snap, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:37ANANikita NesterenkoAssists: Gustav Lindstrom, Isac Lundeström · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:36STLMatthew KesselAssists: Robert Thomas, Brayden Schenn · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:41ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Alex Killorn, Trevor Zegras · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:36STLRobert ThomasPPAssists: Torey Krug, Jordan Kyrou · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:50STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Scott Perunovich · Snap, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 1:01ANALeo CarlssonPPAssists: Isac Lundeström, Troy Terry · Tip-in, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 2:40STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Robert Thomas · Snap, 0.36 xG5–3
  9. P3 8:04ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Trevor Zegras, Ryan Strome · Backhand, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 16:09ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Alex Killorn, Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.10 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Trevor Zegras stopped
  2. 2. STL Jordan Kyrou scored
  3. 3. ANA Leo Carlsson stopped
  4. 4. STL Brayden Schenn stopped
  5. 5. ANA Troy Terry stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 5:36STLMatthew Kessel: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:57ANARyan Strome: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 13:07ANARoss Johnston: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:07ANARoss Johnston: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 13:07STLJordan Binnington: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 19:01STLTyler Tucker: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P3 1:51ANAFrank Vatrano: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLANA
31Shots on goal38
3.5Expected goals3.3
53Shot attempts63
31Faceoffs won27
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
16Hits21
13Blocked shots12
5Giveaways6
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Saad – Buchnevich – Kyrou13:44

    xG 0.61–0.65 (48%)attempts 12–20goals 1–1

  2. Walker – Blais – Alexandrov6:37

    xG 0.00–0.35 (1%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  3. Schenn – Thomas – Bolduc12:16

    xG 0.25–0.64 (28%)attempts 6–11goals 2–1

  4. Hayes – Toropchenko – Dean8:44

    xG 0.21–0.87 (19%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestParayko – Perunovich17:05

    xG 0.71–0.57 (56%)attempts 15–20goals 2–1

  2. Leddy – Tucker12:09

    xG 0.39–0.47 (46%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

  3. Leddy – Parayko3:30

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vatrano – Zegras11:25

    xG 1.12–0.46 (71%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Terry – Carlsson10:58

    xG 0.67–0.30 (69%)attempts 16–9goals 1–2

  3. Silfverberg – Lundeström – Nesterenko11:29

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 12–0goals 1–0

  4. Johnston – Leason – Meyers8:33

    xG 0.14–0.15 (48%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVaakanainen – Lindstrom13:37

    xG 1.17–0.18 (86%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Fowler – Zellweger18:03

    xG 1.27–0.64 (67%)attempts 27–13goals 2–2

  3. Gudas – LaCombe17:13

    xG 0.25–0.45 (36%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.3 xGSTL 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #18 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.89 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).