Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Apr 8, 2024·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT11001011300233
TOR05191811323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:06PITRickard RakellAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:36TORMatthew KniesAssists: TJ Brodie, Morgan Rielly · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:22TORAuston MatthewsPPAssists: John Tavares · Slap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:38PITDrew O'ConnorAssists: Pierre-Olivier Joseph, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:30TORJake McCabeGWGAssists: Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:47TORSimon Benoit: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:18TORIlya Lyubushkin: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 8:17TORWilliam Nylander: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:56PITRickard Rakell: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 11:15TORMark Giordano: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:38TORJake McCabe: Interference2 min
  7. P3 1:19PITErik Karlsson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Tavares
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTOR
33Shots on goal23
4.7Expected goals2.2
75Shot attempts56
28Faceoffs won29
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
31Hits30
20Blocked shots13
8Giveaways11
6Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Rakell – Bunting13:01

    xG 1.53–0.21 (88%)attempts 20–7goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – O'Connor13:42

    xG 1.08–0.37 (75%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  3. Carter – Eller – Smith3:22

    xG 0.01–0.12 (4%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Eller – Smith – Puustinen7:47

    xG 0.03–0.44 (7%)attempts 4–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson15:31

    xG 1.25–0.24 (84%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Joseph16:21

    xG 1.21–0.71 (63%)attempts 15–21goals 1–0

  3. Shea – St. Ivany10:06

    xG 0.22–0.59 (27%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestBertuzzi – Domi – Matthews14:36

    xG 0.54–0.26 (67%)attempts 20–8goals 0–0

  2. Nylander – Holmberg – Knies8:23

    xG 0.49–0.48 (50%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Reaves – Kampf – Dewar5:44

    xG 0.11–0.14 (46%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Tavares – Marner – McMann10:12

    xG 0.44–0.93 (32%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie8:44

    xG 0.42–0.10 (81%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0

  2. Brodie – Rielly3:46

    xG 0.33–0.23 (59%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Rielly – Lyubushkin11:19

    xG 0.28–0.25 (52%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.2 xGPIT 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #473 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).