Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 12, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Calgary Flames 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 70% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI01921219340
CGY2917316632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:37CGYJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Martin Pospisil, Anthony Mantha · Snap, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:43CGYMacKenzie WeegarPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Andrei Kuzmenko · Slap, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 7:05PHITravis KonecnySHAssists: Scott Laughton, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:41CGYNazem KadriPPAssists: Andrei Kuzmenko, Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:11PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Bobby Brink, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 14:46CGYMikael BacklundGWGAssists: Blake Coleman, Connor Zary · Snap, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 15:34CGYJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Martin Pospisil, Jake Bean · Snap, 0.23 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:11PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Matvei Michkov, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:16CGYNazem KadriENAssists: Andrei Kuzmenko, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.50 xG3–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:22PHITravis Konecny: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:22CGYBrayden Pachal: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 7:19PHIRyan Poehling: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 10:08CGYMikael Backlund: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 0:50CGYSamuel Honzek: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 5:41PHIRyan Poehling: Interference2 min
  7. P2 12:48PHITyson Foerster: Instigator2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:48PHITyson Foerster: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:48CGYMartin Pospisil: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 12:48PHITyson Foerster: Instigator misconduct10 min
  11. P2 14:06PHITravis Sanheim: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 4:29PHIErik Johnson: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 8:32CGYConnor Zary: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 16:49CGYAdam Klapka: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Frost won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICGY
40Shots on goal32
3.1Expected goals4.4
71Shot attempts62
36Faceoffs won30
4Power plays5
27Penalty minutes15
28Hits29
17Blocked shots15
12Giveaways22
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Farabee – Brink5:14

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  2. Couturier – Tippett – Foerster2:10

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Konecny – Frost – Michkov6:17

    xG 0.38–0.37 (51%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1

  4. Tippett – Poehling – Foerster3:31

    xG 0.09–0.08 (52%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – York15:28

    xG 0.79–0.53 (60%)attempts 22–10goals 1–1

  2. York – Drysdale2:13

    xG 0.04–0.09 (33%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Ristolainen2:52

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Mantha – Pospisil6:40

    xG 0.67–0.12 (85%)attempts 7–4goals 2–0

  2. Kadri – Kuzmenko – Honzek7:31

    xG 0.38–0.31 (55%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Kirkland – Lomberg – Klapka7:09

    xG 0.11–0.27 (28%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Backlund – Coleman – Zary11:14

    xG 0.51–0.74 (41%)attempts 9–20goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBean – Pachal12:21

    xG 0.63–0.52 (55%)attempts 15–17goals 1–1

  2. Andersson – Bahl12:04

    xG 0.64–0.63 (50%)attempts 9–17goals 1–0

  3. Weegar – Miromanov13:14

    xG 0.47–0.66 (42%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 4.4 xGPHI 3.1 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #321 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.18 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 70% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).