Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 16, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 76% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF3901021400533
PIT11321121811643

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:43BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Alex Tuch · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:08BUFJordan GreenwayAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P1 11:01PITBryan RustPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P1 11:33BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Bowen Byram, Alex Tuch · Snap, 0.15 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:12PITDrew O'ConnorSHAssists: Noel Acciari · Wrist, 0.00 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:20PITJesse PuljujarviAssists: Lars Eller, Drew O'Connor · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:26PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:16BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Henri Jokiharju · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–4
  9. P3 10:56BUFRyan McLeodAssists: Bowen Byram, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:14PITRickard RakellAssists: Bryan Rust, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.17 xG5–5
  11. OT 1:38PITSidney CrosbyPPGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.33 xG5–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:00BUFRyan McLeod: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 7:30PITMarcus Pettersson: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 8:18BUFJason Zucker: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 8:37PITMatt Grzelcyk: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:12BUFJJ Peterka: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  6. P2 17:53BUFAlex Tuch: Interference2 min
  7. P3 1:23BUFZach Benson: Hooking2 min
  8. OT 0:43BUFTage Thompson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against McLeod
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
33Shots on goal43
2.6Expected goals4.4
57Shot attempts73
25Faceoffs won41
1Power plays5
12Penalty minutes4
21Hits18
17Blocked shots14
17Giveaways23
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – Peterka13:13

    xG 1.29–0.78 (62%)attempts 20–13goals 3–0

  2. Cozens – Quinn – Benson8:03

    xG 0.32–0.31 (50%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Krebs7:20

    xG 0.06–0.38 (14%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Zucker – Greenway – McLeod11:36

    xG 0.35–1.19 (22%)attempts 13–18goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Dahlin15:36

    xG 1.27–0.95 (57%)attempts 22–19goals 3–0

  2. Samuelsson – Dahlin2:05

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Clifton – Samuelsson11:29

    xG 0.44–0.52 (46%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Acciari – Glass7:33

    xG 0.46–0.16 (75%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Rakell – Bunting13:26

    xG 0.80–0.51 (61%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  3. Eller – Puljujarvi – O'Connor10:00

    xG 0.21–0.31 (41%)attempts 8–9goals 1–2

  4. Crosby – Rust – Beauvillier12:29

    xG 0.96–1.11 (46%)attempts 18–21goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson15:46

    xG 1.10–0.81 (58%)attempts 15–19goals 1–3

  2. Graves – St. Ivany10:36

    xG 0.43–0.18 (71%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Grzelcyk14:05

    xG 0.93–0.69 (58%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.4 xGBUF 2.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #10 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.43 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 76% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).