Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 16, 2024·Honda Center, Anaheim

Utah Hockey Club 4, Anaheim Ducks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 55% of the time.

ANA winsUTA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
UTA2100821200430
ANA11121011211534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:40ANATroy TerryAssists: Ryan Strome, Frank Vatrano · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:54UTAJack McBainAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Michael Kesselring · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:25UTABarrett HaytonPPAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Dylan Guenther · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:06ANARobby FabbriAssists: Trevor Zegras, Mason McTavish · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:52ANAPavel MintyukovAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:21UTAMichael KesselringAssists: Jack McBain, Josh Doan · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:50UTAClayton KellerAssists: Nick Schmaltz · Backhand, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:55ANAPavel MintyukovAssists: Brock McGinn, Leo Carlsson · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:54ANALeo CarlssonGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG4–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:36UTALawson Crouse: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:45ANACutter Gauthier: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:44UTANick Schmaltz: Holding2 min
  4. P1 0:00ANACam Fowler: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 17:59UTAJack McBain: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 2:12UTAKevin Stenlund: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 3:04UTARobert Bortuzzo: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 7:41ANARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:41UTAJosh Doan: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:41UTAJosh Doan: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 7:41ANARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

UTA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← UTA attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hayton won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

UTAANA
30Shots on goal34
3.3Expected goals3.6
67Shot attempts67
42Faceoffs won26
2Power plays5
14Penalty minutes8
9Hits19
20Blocked shots19
19Giveaways21
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestStenlund – Carcone – Maccelli8:38

    xG 0.68–0.51 (57%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  2. McBain – Guenther – Cooley8:16

    xG 0.34–0.29 (54%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – Hayton13:41

    xG 0.72–0.73 (50%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

  4. Kerfoot – Crouse – Doan8:35

    xG 0.30–0.68 (31%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Kolyachonok6:11

    xG 0.64–0.23 (73%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

  2. Sergachev – Välimäki2:16

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Sergachev – Kesselring13:28

    xG 0.49–0.35 (59%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Gauthier – Carlsson7:55

    xG 0.30–0.15 (67%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. McGinn – Lundeström – Leason7:47

    xG 0.23–0.12 (66%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – McGinn – Carlsson3:27

    xG 0.19–0.08 (70%)attempts 2–7goals 1–0

  4. Strome – Vatrano – Terry9:44

    xG 0.23–0.29 (44%)attempts 11–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Fowler3:15

    xG 0.42–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  2. Fowler – Zellweger2:29

    xG 0.14–0.05 (73%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Gudas – Zellweger10:09

    xG 0.32–0.41 (44%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.6 xGUTA 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAUTA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it UTA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #44 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.72 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
UTA 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 55% of the time.

ANA winsUTA wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − UTA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).