Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 17, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 55% of the time.

SEA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI2110529425
SEA1941515629

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:21PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Ryan Poehling, Garnet Hathaway · Wrap-around, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:15SEABrandon MontourAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Ryker Evans · Slap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:58PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Ryan Poehling · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:06SEAJared McCannPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Vince Dunn · Slap, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:57SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Shane Wright · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:44SEAJordan EberleAssists: Jared McCann, Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–4
  7. P2 17:52SEAShane WrightGWGAssists: Jordan Eberle, Jared McCann · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–5
  8. P3 10:19PHICam YorkAssists: Scott Laughton, Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P3 12:32PHIJamie DrysdalePPAssists: Matvei Michkov · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–5
  10. P3 14:52SEAOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–6
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 6:27PHIMorgan Frost: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 8:35SEAAndre Burakovsky: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 11:04SEAShane Wright: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 2:27PHIJoel Farabee: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:09PHIGarnet Hathaway: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 11:55SEABrandon Tanev: Holding2 min
  7. P2 11:55PHICam York: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 0:57PHIMatvei Michkov: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:12PHIGarnet Hathaway: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 7:31SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 12:24SEABrandon Montour: Roughing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 12:24SEABrandon Montour: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 12:24PHITravis Sanheim: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 12:24PHITravis Konecny: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 12:24SEAYanni Gourde: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Poehling won the faceoff against Gourde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHISEA
25Shots on goal29
2.2Expected goals2.4
60Shot attempts66
31Faceoffs won26
4Power plays5
19Penalty minutes17
27Hits21
21Blocked shots19
10Giveaways12
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Hathaway – Poehling5:17

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 10–5goals 2–0

  2. Couturier – Brink – Foerster2:52

    xG 0.00–0.03 (1%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  3. Konecny – Farabee – Luchanko4:10

    xG 0.09–0.19 (31%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Tippett – Frost – Michkov4:54

    xG 0.20–0.31 (39%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. York – Drysdale2:06

    xG 0.22–0.19 (53%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  2. Johnson – Drysdale7:07

    xG 0.17–0.18 (48%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Ristolainen – Zamula5:39

    xG 0.17–0.27 (39%)attempts 7–9goals 1–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestGourde – Tanev – Kartye6:55

    xG 0.26–0.04 (86%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  2. Burakovsky – Tolvanen – Beniers7:13

    xG 0.15–0.11 (59%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Schwartz – Stephenson – Bjorkstrand6:51

    xG 0.25–0.36 (41%)attempts 6–11goals 2–0

  4. Eberle – McCann – Wright4:37

    xG 0.11–0.26 (30%)attempts 2–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorgen – Evans11:40

    xG 0.74–0.18 (80%)attempts 13–10goals 3–0

  2. Oleksiak – Montour10:22

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 20–5goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Oleksiak3:31

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.4 xGPHI 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #145 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 55% of the time.

SEA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).