Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 22, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Calgary Flames 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT012113211022338
CGY1120627003425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:48CGYRasmus AnderssonAssists: Justin Kirkland, Ryan Lomberg · Snap, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:31PITBryan RustPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:32PITRickard RakellAssists: Kevin Hayes, Matt Grzelcyk · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 7:46CGYMacKenzie WeegarAssists: Daniil Miromanov, Blake Coleman · Slap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:40PITNoel AcciariAssists: Cody Glass, Marcus Pettersson · Wrap-around, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:17CGYNazem KadriAssists: Blake Coleman, Rasmus Andersson · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CGY Andrei Kuzmenko stopped
  2. 2. PIT Rickard Rakell scored
  3. 3. CGY Anthony Mantha scored
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. CGY Rasmus Andersson scored
  6. 6. PIT Bryan Rust scored
  7. 7. CGY Connor Zary stopped
  8. 8. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  9. 9. CGY Nazem Kadri stopped
  10. 10. PIT Lars Eller stopped
  11. 11. CGY Justin Kirkland scored
  12. 12. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:46PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:07CGYMartin Pospisil: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 18:48PITMatt Grzelcyk: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 2:34PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 5:59CGYMartin Pospisil: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:21PITJesse Puljujarvi: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 15:54CGYAndrei Kuzmenko: Holding2 min
  8. P3 0:29CGYMikael Backlund: Kneeing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pospisil won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCGY
38Shots on goal25
2.9Expected goals3.0
66Shot attempts62
48Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
31Hits24
21Blocked shots11
17Giveaways17
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Acciari – Glass6:16

    xG 0.36–0.03 (91%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  2. Malkin – Rakell – Bunting9:27

    xG 0.51–0.32 (62%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  3. Eller – Beauvillier – Puljujarvi6:44

    xG 0.23–0.21 (52%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – O'Connor10:58

    xG 0.45–0.50 (47%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Pettersson11:51

    xG 0.83–0.32 (72%)attempts 22–6goals 1–0

  2. Karlsson – Grzelcyk13:25

    xG 0.53–0.40 (57%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

  3. Karlsson – Pettersson2:25

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Zary11:49

    xG 0.52–0.43 (55%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Kirkland – Lomberg – Klapka3:35

    xG 0.22–0.20 (53%)attempts 2–6goals 1–0

  3. Huberdeau – Mantha – Pospisil4:43

    xG 0.11–0.09 (55%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Pospisil – Kuzmenko2:14

    xG 0.01–0.12 (8%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Andersson – Bahl12:56

    xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

  2. Bean – Pachal12:11

    xG 0.11–0.40 (22%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Weegar – Miromanov13:55

    xG 0.43–0.75 (37%)attempts 14–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.0 xGPIT 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #79 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.89 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).