Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 9, 2024·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Florida Panthers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 50% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI11111317061337
FLA01037011032431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:57PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Scott Laughton, Bobby Brink · Snap, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:32FLANate SchmidtAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Aleksander Barkov · Slap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:40FLADmitry KulikovAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Sam Reinhart · Snap, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:00PHIAnthony RichardAssists: Travis Konecny, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:56FLASam BennettAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Niko Mikkola · Slap, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:47PHIGarnet HathawayAssists: Scott Laughton, Nick Seeler · Backhand, 0.03 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Aleksander Barkov scored
  2. 2. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  3. 3. FLA Sam Reinhart stopped
  4. 4. PHI Owen Tippett scored
  5. 5. FLA Anton Lundell stopped
  6. 6. PHI Bobby Brink stopped
  7. 7. FLA Matthew Tkachuk stopped
  8. 8. PHI Sean Couturier stopped
  9. 9. FLA Evan Rodrigues scored
  10. 10. PHI Morgan Frost stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 6:38FLAEvan Rodrigues: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:09PHINick Seeler: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:40PHIJoel Farabee: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  4. P3 7:31FLAAleksander Barkov: Interference2 min
  5. P3 8:08PHITravis Konecny: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 8:08FLANiko Mikkola: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nosek won the faceoff against Cates
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIFLA
37Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals3.6
55Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won34
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
23Hits16
16Blocked shots7
10Giveaways15
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Farabee – Brink10:03

    xG 0.84–0.76 (53%)attempts 10–15goals 1–3

  2. Richard – Frost – Foerster6:27

    xG 0.00–0.13 (3%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Couturier – Konecny – Tippett15:06

    xG 0.59–0.76 (44%)attempts 15–22goals 0–0

  4. Deslauriers – Hathaway – Cates4:57

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Andrae6:53

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 14–1goals 0–0

  2. Zamula – Andrae7:53

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Sanheim – Drysdale15:02

    xG 0.30–0.67 (31%)attempts 9–25goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBoqvist – Luostarinen – Lundell13:14

    xG 0.89–0.49 (65%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Nosek – Greer – Gadjovich6:27

    xG 0.26–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk10:11

    xG 0.49–0.40 (55%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  4. Barkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:27

    xG 0.41–0.56 (42%)attempts 20–10goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Mikkola17:14

    xG 1.28–0.39 (77%)attempts 24–9goals 2–0

  2. Ekblad – Forsling19:49

    xG 0.61–0.84 (42%)attempts 22–19goals 0–0

  3. Schmidt – Balinskis10:53

    xG 0.04–0.51 (7%)attempts 6–10goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.6 xGPHI 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #291 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 50% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).