Tue, Nov 26, 2024·TD Garden, Boston
Vancouver Canucks 2, Boston Bruins 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 83% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 03 | 16 | 16 | 215 |
| BOS | 09 | 013 | 011 | 033 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 5:53VANJake DeBruskPPGWGAssists: Conor Garland, Quinn Hughes · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–0
- P3 19:47VANConor GarlandENAssists: Pius Suter · Wrist, 0.54 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
- P2 4:05BOSBrad Marchand: Cross checking2 min · PPG
- P2 5:53BOSMorgan Geekie: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
- P2 13:50VANBrock Boeser: Slashing2 min
- P3 5:53VANDakota Joshua: Roughing2 min
- P3 10:15VANBrock Boeser: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Pettersson won the faceoff against Lindholm
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- Blueger – Heinen – Garland2:59
xG 0.06–0.07 (44%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Hoglander – Räty – Bains5:14
xG 0.05–0.07 (40%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
- Blueger – Heinen – Boeser9:28
xG 0.06–0.19 (24%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0
- Joshua – Garland – Suter8:16
xG 0.19–0.41 (31%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Juulsen – Hughes2:19
xG 0.05–0.04 (54%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Myers – Hronek2:25
xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0
- Hronek – Hughes15:09
xG 0.07–0.30 (19%)attempts 5–15goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestKastelic – Koepke – Beecher5:30
xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0
- Pastrnak – Zacha – Geekie11:42
xG 0.35–0.00 (100%)attempts 17–1goals 0–0
- Coyle – Frederic – McLaughlin5:45
xG 0.32–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
- Marchand – Lindholm – Brazeau8:54
xG 0.45–0.19 (71%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMcAvoy – Lohrei15:02
xG 0.88–0.01 (99%)attempts 20–5goals 0–0
- Zadorov – Peeke14:24
xG 0.56–0.18 (76%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0
- Carlo – Wotherspoon14:06
xG 0.11–0.13 (46%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 83% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).