Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 29, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Vancouver Canucks 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
VAN06192611422
BUF170721802334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:33BUFBowen ByramAssists: Zach Benson · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:12VANJake DeBruskAssists: Pius Suter, Brock Boeser · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P3 5:15VANConor GarlandPPAssists: Brock Boeser, Quinn Hughes · Tip-in, 0.21 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:00VANPius SuterAssists: Conor Garland · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P3 13:18BUFDylan CozensAssists: Connor Clifton · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:57BUFAlex TuchAssists: Dylan Cozens, Zach Benson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:59VANConor GarlandGWGAssists: Quinn Hughes, Elias Pettersson · Backhand, 0.27 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:29VANErik Brannstrom: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 5:14VANKiefer Sherwood: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 9:41BUFJiri Kulich: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 15:06VANVincent Desharnais: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 19:09BUFOwen Power: Interference2 min
  6. P3 1:05VANElias Pettersson: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 4:23BUFDylan Cozens: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 4:23BUFDylan Cozens: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 15:46VANTeddy Blueger: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← VAN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suter won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANBUF
22Shots on goal34
2.1Expected goals3.3
48Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
24Hits18
17Blocked shots15
19Giveaways18
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBoeser – DeBrusk – Pettersson4:51

    xG 0.16–0.10 (62%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Sherwood – Hoglander – Räty2:08

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Boeser – Hoglander – Räty3:01

    xG 0.03–0.14 (16%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. DeBrusk – Pettersson – Sherwood3:36

    xG 0.04–0.16 (20%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Hughes13:28

    xG 0.66–0.46 (59%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  2. Soucy – Juulsen9:10

    xG 0.18–0.44 (29%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

  3. Desharnais – Brannstrom10:06

    xG 0.00–0.45 (1%)attempts 5–15goals 0–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – Peterka7:01

    xG 0.52–0.14 (79%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Tuch – Cozens – Benson2:56

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 2–0

  3. Krebs – Cozens – Benson6:30

    xG 0.19–0.18 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  4. Zucker – McLeod – Krebs2:06

    xG 0.01–0.01 (57%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Byram15:55

    xG 0.46–0.07 (87%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

  2. Jokiharju – Power11:09

    xG 0.52–0.18 (74%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  3. Clifton – Bryson7:11

    xG 0.39–0.19 (67%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.3 xGVAN 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #73 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.60 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).