Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 1, 2024·Honda Center, Anaheim

Ottawa Senators 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 65% of the time.

ANA winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
OTT18111110020331
ANA21101316042434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:45ANAFrank VatranoPPAssists: Ryan Strome, Troy Terry · Snap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:36OTTBrady TkachukPPAssists: Tim Stützle, Drake Batherson · Tip-in, 0.25 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:54ANAJackson LaCombeAssists: Troy Terry, Frank Vatrano · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 0:37OTTBrady TkachukAssists: Thomas Chabot, Nick Jensen · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:37ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Troy Terry, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:46OTTNick CousinsAssists: Michael Amadio · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Cutter Gauthier stopped
  2. 2. OTT Tim Stützle stopped
  3. 3. ANA Troy Terry scored
  4. 4. OTT Josh Norris stopped
  5. 5. ANA Trevor Zegras scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 14:00OTTNoah Gregor: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:37ANAPavel Mintyukov: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:54ANAAlex Killorn: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 4:32OTTRidly Greig: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 9:49ANARadko Gudas: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 12:58ANAFrank Vatrano: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 16:11OTTClaude Giroux: Holding2 min
  8. P3 7:43OTTNick Cousins: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:43ANAJansen Harkins: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:43OTTNick Cousins: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 7:43ANAJansen Harkins: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← OTT attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00McTavish won the faceoff against Pinto
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTANA
31Shots on goal34
4.7Expected goals3.7
70Shot attempts65
33Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
10Penalty minutes12
22Hits32
19Blocked shots17
16Giveaways21
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNorris – Batherson – Tkachuk9:12

    xG 0.52–0.07 (89%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Cousins – Amadio – Pinto10:20

    xG 0.60–0.56 (52%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  3. Gregor – Greig – Ostapchuk5:20

    xG 0.08–0.38 (18%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Gaudette – Stützle10:09

    xG 0.20–1.08 (16%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJensen – Chabot17:51

    xG 0.96–0.51 (65%)attempts 18–16goals 1–0

  2. Bernard-Docker – Kleven10:17

    xG 0.17–0.33 (34%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Hamonic – Sanderson15:42

    xG 0.43–1.33 (24%)attempts 17–20goals 0–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vatrano – Terry12:45

    xG 1.63–0.24 (87%)attempts 24–7goals 2–0

  2. Johnston – Harkins – Colangelo4:48

    xG 0.26–0.00 (98%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Lundeström – Leason – Gauthier9:11

    xG 0.06–0.42 (12%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

  4. Killorn – Zegras – McTavish11:29

    xG 0.19–0.71 (21%)attempts 8–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLaCombe – Zellweger14:21

    xG 1.35–0.43 (76%)attempts 19–13goals 2–0

  2. Dumoulin – Helleson14:17

    xG 0.65–0.76 (46%)attempts 16–17goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Mintyukov13:22

    xG 0.20–0.43 (32%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.7 xGOTT 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #366 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 65% of the time.

ANA winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).