Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 5, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

St. Louis Blues 4, Calgary Flames 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 60% of the time.

CGY winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL28091413424
CGY1141911501339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:49STLZachary BolducPPAssists: Brayden Schenn, Philip Broberg · Snap, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:49STLRobert ThomasAssists: Jake Neighbours, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P1 15:04CGYJakob PelletierAssists: Ryan Lomberg, Daniil Miromanov · Snap, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:23CGYMatt CoronatoPPAssists: Connor Zary, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:00STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Robert Thomas, Philip Broberg · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:06CGYMacKenzie WeegarAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:25STLColton ParaykoGWGAssists: Robert Thomas, Dylan Holloway · Poke, 0.29 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 8:03STLMatthew Kessel: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:08CGYKevin Bahl: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:35STLAlexey Toropchenko: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 3:57STLBrandon Saad: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:01CGYNazem Kadri: Holding2 min
  6. P2 12:01STLNathan Walker: Interference2 min
  7. P3 3:54CGYMartin Pospisil: Interference2 min
  8. P3 6:13CGYNazem Kadri: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 6:41STLJordan Binnington: Delaying game illegal play by goalie2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← STL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Thomas
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCGY
24Shots on goal39
2.9Expected goals3.5
47Shot attempts75
43Faceoffs won37
3Power plays4
10Penalty minutes8
16Hits20
21Blocked shots10
19Giveaways11
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBuchnevich – Thomas – Neighbours11:00

    xG 1.04–0.26 (80%)attempts 12–11goals 2–0

  2. Faksa – Walker – Toropchenko8:31

    xG 0.43–0.38 (53%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  3. Saad – Sundqvist – Bolduc6:50

    xG 0.02–0.27 (5%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  4. Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway9:42

    xG 0.35–0.89 (28%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJoseph – Perunovich4:11

    xG 0.56–0.35 (62%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  2. Suter – Perunovich2:22

    xG 0.15–0.03 (81%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Parayko – Broberg17:53

    xG 0.78–1.08 (42%)attempts 14–26goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestColeman – Zary – Duehr8:04

    xG 0.70–0.09 (89%)attempts 17–4goals 0–0

  2. Lomberg – Rooney – Pelletier6:01

    xG 0.54–0.06 (90%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  3. Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil12:44

    xG 0.67–0.68 (50%)attempts 20–11goals 0–1

  4. Backlund – Sharangovich – Coronato8:43

    xG 0.23–0.78 (23%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBean – Pachal10:01

    xG 0.95–0.35 (73%)attempts 20–5goals 0–0

  2. Andersson – Bahl15:11

    xG 0.41–0.39 (51%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

  3. Weegar – Miromanov14:50

    xG 0.86–1.02 (46%)attempts 22–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.5 xGSTL 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #133 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 60% of the time.

CGY winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).