Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 17, 2024·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ05010317332
TBL11131517533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:21TBLLuke GlendeningAssists: Nick Perbix, Emil Lilleberg · Tip-in, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:28TBLNick PaulUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P2 7:36TBLJake GuentzelAssists: Nick Paul · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 14:18TBLMitchell ChaffeePPGWGAssists: Nick Paul, Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:23CBJMikael PyyhtiaAssists: Sean Kuraly · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 8:05CBJAdam FantilliAssists: Kirill Marchenko · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:11CBJCole SillingerPPAssists: Dmitri Voronkov, Kirill Marchenko · Snap, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:51TBLBrayden PointENAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.70 xG3–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:21TBLNick Perbix: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 3:08TBLConor Geekie: Kneeing2 min
  3. P2 9:53TBLBrandon Hagel: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 9:53CBJCole Sillinger: Instigator2 min
  5. P2 9:53CBJMathieu Olivier: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 9:53TBLConor Geekie: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 9:53CBJCole Sillinger: Fighting5 min · PPG
  8. P2 9:53CBJCole Sillinger: Instigator misconduct10 min
  9. P2 18:49TBLMichael Eyssimont: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 1:31TBLLuke Glendening: Holding2 min
  11. P3 12:38TBLRyan McDonagh: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
43% to win57% to win
← CBJ attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Monahan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJTBL
32Shots on goal33
3.0Expected goals4.1
67Shot attempts51
29Faceoffs won35
5Power plays2
19Penalty minutes14
24Hits16
5Blocked shots22
18Giveaways27
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Olivier – Pyyhtia2:02

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

  2. Kuraly – Olivier – Aston-Reese4:33

    xG 0.10–0.21 (32%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Kuraly – Labanc – Pyyhtia3:35

    xG 0.06–0.27 (19%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  4. Olivier – Aston-Reese – Sillinger5:38

    xG 0.06–0.35 (15%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWerenski – Fabbro8:13

    xG 0.43–0.25 (63%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  2. Severson – Werenski2:14

    xG 0.07–0.02 (81%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

  3. Provorov – Christiansen2:13

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Guentzel – Point10:54

    xG 0.95–0.26 (78%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

  2. Glendening – Girgensons – Eyssimont6:36

    xG 0.66–0.03 (95%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  3. Paul – Chaffee – Goncalves9:49

    xG 0.59–0.13 (81%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  4. Cirelli – Hagel – Geekie8:36

    xG 0.33–0.16 (67%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPerbix – Lilleberg11:29

    xG 0.73–0.19 (79%)attempts 14–9goals 2–0

  2. McDonagh – Cernak13:42

    xG 0.73–0.26 (74%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Raddysh11:31

    xG 0.81–0.52 (61%)attempts 13–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.1 xGCBJ 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #209 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).