Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 18, 2024·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Florida Panthers 6, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 71% of the time.

MIN winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA28215210633
MIN1150705127

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:48FLAAaron EkbladAssists: Jesper Boqvist, Mackie Samoskevich · Slap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:11MINMarco RossiPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:14FLAMackie SamoskevichGWGAssists: Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:28FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Carter Verhaeghe · Poke, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:54FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–1
  6. P3 11:10FLANiko MikkolaAssists: Anton Lundell, Sam Reinhart · Wrist, 0.05 xG5–1
  7. P3 19:30FLAEetu LuostarinenAssists: Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.17 xG6–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 13:49FLAA.J. Greer: Charging2 min
  2. P1 15:03FLASam Reinhart: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 15:28MINRyan Hartman: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 15:28FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 18:19MINMatt Boldy: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 17:02MINRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 17:02MINRyan Hartman: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 17:02FLAAnton Lundell: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaudreau won the faceoff against Nosek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAMIN
33Shots on goal27
3.3Expected goals2.1
59Shot attempts51
31Faceoffs won27
2Power plays2
16Penalty minutes16
42Hits25
11Blocked shots9
11Giveaways15
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestNosek – Greer – Gadjovich9:43

    xG 0.51–0.01 (98%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Reinhart – Luostarinen – Lundell11:40

    xG 0.42–0.31 (57%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Tkachuk10:57

    xG 0.66–0.57 (54%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  4. Rodrigues – Boqvist – Samoskevich6:43

    xG 0.07–0.24 (22%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMikkola – Balinskis5:50

    xG 0.65–0.11 (86%)attempts 9–3goals 2–0

  2. Schmidt – Balinskis8:10

    xG 0.53–0.18 (74%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Kulikov – Mikkola11:31

    xG 0.35–0.24 (60%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestGaunce – Shore – Khusnutdinov2:56

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Johansson – Hartman – Boldy8:59

    xG 0.44–0.36 (55%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  3. Foligno – Shore – Hartman2:46

    xG 0.01–0.05 (17%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi14:53

    xG 0.64–0.69 (48%)attempts 19–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Chisholm17:06

    xG 1.01–0.61 (62%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Bogosian – Merrill10:48

    xG 0.13–0.30 (30%)attempts 7–9goals 0–2

  3. Brodin – Faber19:57

    xG 0.33–1.40 (19%)attempts 12–26goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.1 xGFLA 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 29/100 · #925 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.00 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 71% of the time.

MIN winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).