Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 23, 2024·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

San Jose Sharks 3, Vancouver Canucks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11006213329
VAN1631404424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:36SJSWilliam EklundPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Macklin Celebrini · Slap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:10VANBrock BoeserAssists: Quinn Hughes, Vincent Desharnais · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:42VANKiefer SherwoodAssists: Teddy Blueger, Nils Hoglander · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:08VANElias PetterssonAssists: Jake DeBrusk, Conor Garland · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:52VANElias PetterssonPPGWGAssists: J.T. Miller, Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:21SJSCody CeciAssists: Fabian Zetterlund · Slap, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:54SJSLuke KuninAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Tyler Toffoli · Snap, 0.05 xG3–4
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 1:12SJSTimothy Liljegren: Holding2 min
  2. P1 10:30VANCarson Soucy: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:11VANDerek Forbort: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 14:13VANTyler Myers: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 14:13SJSBarclay Goodrow: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 18:29SJSLuke Kunin: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 9:36SJSTy Dellandrea: Interference2 min
  8. P2 9:36VANDanton Heinen: Instigator2 min
  9. P2 9:36SJSTy Dellandrea: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 9:36VANDanton Heinen: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 9:36VANDanton Heinen: Instigator misconduct10 min
  12. P2 11:44SJSJan Rutta: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 11:44VANTeddy Blueger: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 11:44SJSJan Rutta: Roughing2 min
  15. P2 17:08SJSWill Smith: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min · PPG
  16. P2 17:20SJSMario Ferraro: Hooking2 min
  17. P2 19:40VANTeddy Blueger: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Miller won the faceoff against Celebrini
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSVAN
29Shots on goal24
2.8Expected goals2.9
72Shot attempts45
24Faceoffs won35
3Power plays5
24Penalty minutes30
18Hits27
7Blocked shots22
19Giveaways17
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestKunin – Zetterlund – Kovalenko3:20

    xG 0.31–0.01 (97%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Wennberg – Kunin – Zetterlund3:17

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  3. Toffoli – Granlund – Celebrini10:46

    xG 0.29–0.18 (62%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Eklund – Smith2:32

    xG 0.13–0.07 (65%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRutta – Mukhamadullin11:41

    xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Ceci – Thrun11:10

    xG 0.33–0.14 (71%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Ceci – Ferraro2:01

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestJoshua – Garland – Suter6:29

    xG 0.31–0.02 (93%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Miller – Di Giuseppe – Boeser7:44

    xG 0.26–0.15 (64%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Blueger – Joshua – Garland2:54

    xG 0.03–0.05 (41%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Blueger – Heinen – Sherwood6:06

    xG 0.01–0.07 (17%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Hughes5:08

    xG 0.67–0.31 (69%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Soucy – Juulsen9:04

    xG 0.20–0.08 (72%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

  3. Juulsen – Hughes3:23

    xG 0.20–0.10 (66%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.9 xGSJS 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #399 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).