Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 2, 2025·Capital One Arena, Washington

Minnesota Wild 4, Washington Capitals 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

WSH winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN21107114011433
WSH11317110010331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:19WSHTom WilsonAssists: Rasmus Sandin · Snap, 0.32 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:24MINRyan HartmanAssists: Zach Bogosian, Joel Eriksson Ek · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:07MINYakov TreninSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:08WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Dylan Strome · Snap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:34WSHMartin FehérváryAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:19MINMarco RossiAssists: Ryan Hartman, Jonas Brodin · Snap, 0.25 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. WSH Dylan Strome stopped
  2. 2. MIN Mats Zuccarello stopped
  3. 3. WSH Pierre-Luc Dubois stopped
  4. 4. MIN Matt Boldy scored
  5. 5. WSH Alex Ovechkin stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 18:12MINZach Bogosian: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 8:43WSHTom Wilson: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 14:04MINMarat Khusnutdinov: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P3 6:47WSHNic Dowd: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
43% to win57% to win
← MIN attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaudreau won the faceoff against Dowd
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINWSH
33Shots on goal31
3.2Expected goals2.6
63Shot attempts69
20Faceoffs won35
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
10Hits16
14Blocked shots16
18Giveaways13
10Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Gaudreau – Trenin9:19

    xG 0.60–0.24 (71%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  2. Shore – Jones – Khusnutdinov6:12

    xG 0.37–0.20 (64%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Zuccarello – Eriksson Ek – Boldy3:03

    xG 0.09–0.14 (41%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Johansson – Hartman – Gaudreau2:51

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Chisholm14:31

    xG 0.85–0.45 (65%)attempts 19–17goals 1–0

  2. Merrill – Dermott8:33

    xG 0.12–0.09 (58%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  3. Brodin – Faber19:41

    xG 0.72–1.21 (37%)attempts 16–25goals 1–1

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestWilson – Dubois – Protas10:45

    xG 0.94–0.10 (90%)attempts 19–8goals 2–0

  2. Eller – Mangiapane – Miroshnichenko7:29

    xG 0.15–0.14 (53%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Dowd – Raddysh – Duhaime9:53

    xG 0.23–0.79 (22%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  4. Ovechkin – Strome – McMichael8:55

    xG 0.39–1.02 (28%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Sandin13:05

    xG 1.05–0.88 (54%)attempts 21–13goals 1–0

  2. Roy – Fehérváry12:47

    xG 0.56–0.45 (55%)attempts 14–13goals 1–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Sandin2:58

    xG 0.03–0.09 (24%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.6 xGMIN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #264 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

WSH winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).