Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 3, 2025·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT01314111030231
FLA010110110032333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:36FLAGustav ForslingAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Sam Reinhart · Snap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:09PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Matt Grzelcyk · Slap, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P3 8:48FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Adam Boqvist · Deflected, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:20PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Michael Bunting, Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.20 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Aleksander Barkov stopped
  2. 2. PIT Rickard Rakell stopped
  3. 3. FLA Sam Reinhart scored
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. FLA Anton Lundell scored
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 9:18FLASam Reinhart: High sticking double minor4 min
  2. P2 2:16FLAA.J. Greer: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 11:04FLAA.J. Greer: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:38PITBryan Rust: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  5. P2 14:38PITRickard Rakell: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 14:38PITMichael Bunting: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:38FLAEvan Rodrigues: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:38FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P2 14:38FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 19:56PITMarcus Pettersson: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 6:57PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 9:08FLAAaron Ekblad: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 17:59FLASam Bennett: Roughing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITFLA
31Shots on goal33
4.7Expected goals4.0
65Shot attempts74
28Faceoffs won30
7Power plays3
10Penalty minutes28
15Hits28
10Blocked shots12
8Giveaways7
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Rakell9:26

    xG 0.69–0.28 (71%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  2. Hayes – Tomasino – O'Connor2:51

    xG 0.25–0.30 (46%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Bunting – Glass10:51

    xG 0.36–0.48 (43%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  4. Nieto – Acciari – Lizotte8:54

    xG 0.25–0.56 (31%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Grzelcyk9:28

    xG 0.98–0.12 (89%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  2. Pettersson – Joseph15:11

    xG 0.32–0.46 (41%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Pettersson2:25

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestNosek – Greer – Samoskevich2:12

    xG 0.26–0.02 (93%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Bennett – Tkachuk – Luostarinen5:38

    xG 0.39–0.21 (65%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Barkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues5:30

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  4. Bennett – Luostarinen – Samoskevich2:07

    xG 0.09–0.12 (43%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Balinskis11:27

    xG 0.69–0.37 (65%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  2. Schmidt – Boqvist9:36

    xG 0.45–0.39 (53%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

  3. Ekblad – Forsling11:59

    xG 0.45–0.82 (35%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.0 xGPIT 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #250 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).