Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 9, 2025·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Edmonton Oilers 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM17221015343
PIT4131607526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:19PITRickard RakellAssists: Bryan Rust, Marcus Pettersson · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:22PITBryan RustAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:46PITKevin HayesAssists: Drew O'Connor, Jesse Puljujarvi · Snap, 0.27 xG0–3
  4. P1 12:33EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Zach Hyman, Connor McDavid · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P1 13:41PITDrew O'ConnorGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P2 5:42PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Michael Bunting, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.15 xG1–5
  7. P2 10:58EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Connor McDavid, Mattias Ekholm · Slap, 0.04 xG2–5
  8. P2 19:15EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 5:01EDMVasily Podkolzin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 6:07PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 10:58PITMichael Bunting: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 10:58EDMKasperi Kapanen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 18:09PITBryan Rust: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P3 11:04PITMichael Bunting: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← EDM attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMPIT
43Shots on goal26
3.2Expected goals3.8
85Shot attempts55
32Faceoffs won26
3Power plays1
4Penalty minutes8
16Hits16
13Blocked shots24
14Giveaways9
0Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Draisaitl – McDavid11:29

    xG 0.91–0.42 (69%)attempts 24–11goals 2–1

  2. Perry – Henrique – Skinner2:01

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Draisaitl – Arvidsson – Podkolzin2:24

    xG 0.03–0.01 (79%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Janmark – Kapanen4:03

    xG 0.06–0.14 (30%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard16:36

    xG 1.23–0.74 (62%)attempts 30–15goals 2–1

  2. Brown – Nurse7:58

    xG 0.49–0.17 (74%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  3. Brown – Emberson2:00

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestNieto – Acciari – Lizotte8:12

    xG 0.45–0.07 (86%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Bunting – Beauvillier – Glass8:47

    xG 0.38–0.07 (85%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Puljujarvi – O'Connor7:31

    xG 0.58–0.52 (53%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Rakell15:50

    xG 0.80–0.98 (45%)attempts 16–25goals 2–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJoseph – Pickering11:31

    xG 0.60–0.33 (65%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Pettersson17:06

    xG 1.10–0.93 (54%)attempts 18–26goals 4–1

  3. Karlsson – Grzelcyk16:08

    xG 0.58–0.79 (42%)attempts 15–26goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGEDM 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #411 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.77 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +11 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).