Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 9, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Anaheim Ducks 2, St. Louis Blues 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 71% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA181807223
STL41621008634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:45STLRobert ThomasUnassisted · Snap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:31STLTyler TuckerAssists: Oskar Sundqvist, Zachary Bolduc · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P1 6:40STLJordan KyrouGWGAssists: Cam Fowler, Brayden Schenn · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P1 13:55STLDylan HollowayAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Brayden Schenn · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–4
  5. P1 16:00ANANikita NesterenkoAssists: Jackson LaCombe · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 4:45STLRobert ThomasAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Brandon Saad · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–5
  7. P2 8:02STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Brandon Saad, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–6
  8. P2 14:38ANASam ColangeloAssists: Ryan Strome, Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:20ANACutter Gauthier: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 15:28STLNathan Walker: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 17:44STLTyler Tucker: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 17:44ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 17:54STLRobert Thomas: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASTL
23Shots on goal34
1.8Expected goals2.9
55Shot attempts62
24Faceoffs won28
2Power plays1
4Penalty minutes6
29Hits28
16Blocked shots17
18Giveaways20
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Lundeström – Carlsson11:54

    xG 0.58–0.20 (75%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Fabbri – McTavish – Gauthier10:48

    xG 0.34–0.46 (42%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  3. Harkins – Leason – Nesterenko9:56

    xG 0.29–0.57 (34%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

  4. Strome – Vatrano – Colangelo9:25

    xG 0.25–1.06 (19%)attempts 7–19goals 1–3

Defence pairs

  1. Helleson – Mintyukov16:48

    xG 0.28–0.36 (43%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  2. Gudas – LaCombe16:13

    xG 0.76–1.08 (41%)attempts 20–24goals 2–2

  3. Dumoulin – Trouba15:19

    xG 0.61–1.28 (32%)attempts 14–19goals 0–4

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Kyrou – Holloway11:45

    xG 0.93–0.17 (85%)attempts 19–7goals 2–0

  2. Saad – Buchnevich – Thomas10:36

    xG 1.05–0.42 (71%)attempts 15–11goals 2–2

  3. Sundqvist – Neighbours – Bolduc11:10

    xG 0.16–0.50 (24%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

  4. Faksa – Walker – Toropchenko11:51

    xG 0.15–0.62 (19%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Parayko14:15

    xG 0.87–0.27 (77%)attempts 15–12goals 2–0

  2. Faulk – Broberg14:34

    xG 0.76–0.36 (68%)attempts 20–9goals 1–2

  3. Fowler – Broberg2:26

    xG 0.13–0.15 (47%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.9 xGANA 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #1023 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.56 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +10 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 71% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).