Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 11, 2025·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Anaheim Ducks 0, Philadelphia Flyers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA070708022
PHI21415311630

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:48PHIMorgan FrostGWGAssists: Travis Konecny, Owen Tippett · Snap, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:11PHIJamie DrysdalePPAssists: Travis Konecny, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 16:12PHIOwen TippettAssists: Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P3 0:24PHIRyan PoehlingAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Travis Sanheim · Snap, 0.21 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:36PHIMatvei MichkovPPAssists: Travis Konecny, Jamie Drysdale · Snap, 0.12 xG0–5
  6. P3 8:55PHIGarnet HathawayAssists: Ryan Poehling, Scott Laughton · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–6
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 9:44ANAMason McTavish: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 17:05ANARyan Strome: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:20PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:20ANARobby Fabbri: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 19:20ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:20PHIGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 0:00ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 0:00PHITravis Sanheim: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 0:00ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 8:29PHIMorgan Frost: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 16:57ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 16:57PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 2:44PHIMatvei Michkov: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 2:44ANARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 6:35ANARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min · PPG
  16. P3 6:35PHINick Seeler: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 6:35ANARyan Strome: Cross checking2 min
  18. P3 6:35ANARadko Gudas: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Poehling won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAPHI
22Shots on goal30
1.2Expected goals3.1
44Shot attempts64
33Faceoffs won30
1Power plays4
30Penalty minutes14
31Hits29
19Blocked shots12
10Giveaways15
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Killorn – Lundeström – Carlsson10:25

    xG 0.06–0.24 (20%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  2. Strome – Vatrano – Colangelo8:08

    xG 0.32–0.77 (30%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  3. Fabbri – McTavish – Gauthier9:44

    xG 0.28–0.74 (27%)attempts 11–20goals 0–1

  4. Johnston – Harkins – Leason7:13

    xG 0.00–0.64 (0%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Helleson – LaCombe2:53

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Dumoulin – Helleson3:12

    xG 0.04–0.07 (36%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Trouba – Mintyukov2:56

    xG 0.27–0.32 (46%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestKonecny – Tippett – Frost8:59

    xG 1.01–0.07 (93%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  2. Laughton – Hathaway – Poehling9:30

    xG 0.50–0.09 (84%)attempts 7–6goals 2–0

  3. Cates – Brink – Foerster10:12

    xG 0.49–0.25 (66%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  4. Couturier – Lycksell – Michkov10:02

    xG 0.11–0.50 (18%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRistolainen – Zamula11:29

    xG 0.94–0.08 (92%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – York15:39

    xG 0.65–0.22 (75%)attempts 15–9goals 2–0

  3. Seeler – Drysdale9:06

    xG 0.53–0.14 (79%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.1 xGANA 1.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1273 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +12 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).