Tue, Jan 14, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis
Calgary Flames 1, St. Louis Blues 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 08 | 010 | 110 | 128 |
| STL | 18 | 09 | 18 | 225 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 0:49STLColton ParaykoAssists: Brayden Schenn, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
- P3 6:06CGYKevin BahlAssists: Martin Pospisil · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
- P3 11:11STLRadek FaksaGWGAssists: Tyler Tucker, Alexey Toropchenko · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 10:53CGYBlake Coleman: Cross checking2 min
- P1 13:38STLOskar Sundqvist: Slashing2 min
- P2 4:32CGYBrayden Pachal: Tripping2 min
- P2 15:48STLRyan Suter: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Schenn
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestSharangovich – Pelletier – Kerins8:06
xG 0.23–0.04 (84%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
- Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil10:41
xG 0.32–0.24 (57%)attempts 18–11goals 0–1
- Backlund – Coleman – Coronato12:03
xG 0.35–0.35 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1
- Lomberg – Rooney – Duehr6:45
xG 0.12–0.13 (49%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestAndersson – Bahl15:45
xG 0.54–0.27 (66%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0
- Weegar – Hanley16:49
xG 0.54–0.30 (65%)attempts 17–14goals 0–2
- Bean – Pachal11:27
xG 0.12–0.52 (19%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestFaksa – Joseph – Toropchenko8:44
xG 0.43–0.18 (71%)attempts 10–15goals 1–0
- Saad – Sundqvist – Texier5:56
xG 0.12–0.07 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway11:52
xG 0.31–0.30 (51%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0
- Buchnevich – Thomas – Neighbours11:55
xG 0.18–0.48 (27%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFowler – Parayko17:55
xG 0.55–0.43 (56%)attempts 16–27goals 1–0
- Faulk – Broberg12:50
xG 0.31–0.30 (51%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1
- Suter – Tucker10:41
xG 0.26–0.47 (35%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (STL − CGY), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).