Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 25, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Florida Panthers 7, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 76% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA31341108732
SJS2100904223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:47FLANate SchmidtUnassisted · Slap, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:50SJSCody CeciAssists: Jake Walman · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 7:22SJSWill SmithAssists: Mario Ferraro, Fabian Zetterlund · Snap, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P1 14:27FLASam BennettAssists: A.J. Greer, Niko Mikkola · Deflected, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P1 17:08FLAAaron EkbladGWGAssists: Matthew Tkachuk · Snap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 3:01FLAA.J. GreerAssists: Tomas Nosek · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P2 5:35FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Aaron Ekblad · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–2
  8. P2 13:07FLAJesper BoqvistAssists: Anton Lundell, Carter Verhaeghe · Wrist, 0.25 xG6–2
  9. P2 16:25FLASam ReinhartAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.14 xG7–2
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 14:27SJSWill Smith: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  2. P2 5:17SJSTyler Toffoli: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P3 15:10FLANiko Mikkola: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLASJS
32Shots on goal23
3.9Expected goals2.1
68Shot attempts43
29Faceoffs won26
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
19Hits22
9Blocked shots20
11Giveaways10
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBarkov – Reinhart – Tkachuk12:49

    xG 0.83–0.24 (77%)attempts 16–8goals 1–1

  2. Verhaeghe – Boqvist – Lundell11:31

    xG 0.54–0.35 (60%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  3. Nosek – Greer – Rodrigues11:52

    xG 0.45–0.40 (53%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  4. Bennett – Luostarinen – Samoskevich10:44

    xG 0.62–0.96 (39%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling14:29

    xG 1.11–0.48 (70%)attempts 24–16goals 2–1

  2. Schmidt – Balinskis14:56

    xG 0.87–0.74 (54%)attempts 18–13goals 2–0

  3. Kulikov – Mikkola16:36

    xG 0.48–0.70 (41%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Zetterlund – Smith12:00

    xG 0.79–0.68 (54%)attempts 13–14goals 2–1

  2. Wennberg – Kunin – Kovalenko12:29

    xG 0.45–0.42 (52%)attempts 9–9goals 0–2

  3. Toffoli – Eklund – Celebrini11:56

    xG 0.26–0.64 (29%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  4. Goodrow – Sabourin – Duehr9:23

    xG 0.00–0.83 (0%)attempts 1–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestCeci – Walman16:41

    xG 0.88–0.81 (52%)attempts 11–22goals 1–2

  2. Ferraro – Liljegren17:21

    xG 0.49–0.51 (49%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  3. Vlasic – Thrun13:42

    xG 0.03–1.15 (3%)attempts 6–16goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.1 xGFLA 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #606 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 76% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).