Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 7, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Colorado Avalanche 5, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL31217112531
EDM21121006427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:48COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Cale Makar, Artturi Lehkonen · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:39EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:46COLCale MakarAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P1 12:22EDMCorey PerryAssists: Adam Henrique, Kasperi Kapanen · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P1 18:08COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.21 xG3–2
  6. P2 6:39COLCale MakarSHAssists: Parker Kelly · Snap, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P2 7:48EDMCorey PerryPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.38 xG4–3
  8. P2 15:59EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Snap, 0.32 xG4–4
  9. P3 15:38COLMartin NecasGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.21 xG5–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 9:18EDMZach Hyman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:33COLArtturi Lehkonen: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:17EDMLeon Draisaitl: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 3:38COLParker Kelly: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:59COLMartin Necas: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:33COLArtturi Lehkonen: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 15:05EDMEvan Bouchard: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 15:05COLJuuso Parssinen: Holding the stick2 min
  9. P2 18:48EDMDarnell Nurse: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 5:21EDMEvan Bouchard: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 5:52EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Kelly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLEDM
31Shots on goal27
3.9Expected goals3.5
59Shot attempts61
31Faceoffs won28
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
15Hits9
19Blocked shots12
11Giveaways17
3Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestWood – Colton – Drury8:14

    xG 0.34–0.23 (60%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas13:14

    xG 1.04–0.94 (53%)attempts 16–15goals 2–0

  3. Drouin – Mittelstadt – Parssinen5:47

    xG 0.13–0.19 (41%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Kelly – O'Connor – Kiviranta7:48

    xG 0.18–0.24 (43%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Girard2:54

    xG 0.38–0.19 (67%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  2. Girard – Malinski8:35

    xG 0.34–0.25 (58%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. de Haan – Girard3:08

    xG 0.21–0.23 (48%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Henrique – Kapanen2:33

    xG 0.13–0.06 (68%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid4:18

    xG 0.35–0.28 (55%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Kapanen – Podkolzin2:30

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Draisaitl – Podkolzin4:02

    xG 0.11–0.15 (42%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Kulak – Emberson5:09

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Ekholm – Bouchard11:06

    xG 0.86–0.89 (49%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

  3. Klingberg – Nurse11:24

    xG 0.39–0.44 (47%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.5 xGCOL 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #51 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).