Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 1, 2025·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Calgary Flames 0, Florida Panthers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 84% of the time.

FLA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY0606011023
FLA01621917342

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:47FLAJonah GadjovichGWGAssists: A.J. Greer, Nate Schmidt · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–1
  2. P2 19:24FLAEvan RodriguesAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Sam Bennett · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P3 16:08FLAMackie SamoskevichAssists: Sam Bennett, Evan Rodrigues · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 10:28FLACarter Verhaeghe: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 11:38CGYRasmus Andersson: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 16:07FLACarter Verhaeghe: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:07FLAAaron Ekblad: Elbowing2 min
  5. P1 16:07FLAAaron Ekblad: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 16:07CGYMartin Pospisil: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 16:07CGYNazem Kadri: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 4:47CGYMorgan Frost: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  9. P2 9:47CGYYegor Sharangovich: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 14:04CGYIlya Solovyov: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 0:00CGYBrayden Pachal: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 0:00FLAA.J. Greer: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 0:00FLAA.J. Greer: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← CGY attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Rooney
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYFLA
23Shots on goal42
1.8Expected goals4.1
42Shot attempts76
31Faceoffs won33
2Power plays4
14Penalty minutes12
29Hits17
21Blocked shots8
12Giveaways18
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Frost – Coronato5:22

    xG 0.46–0.01 (99%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Backlund – Coleman – Sharangovich10:17

    xG 0.42–0.18 (70%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  3. Lomberg – Rooney – Farabee2:29

    xG 0.04–0.02 (70%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Andersson – Bahl13:33

    xG 0.40–0.37 (52%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  2. Weegar – Hanley18:14

    xG 0.44–0.75 (37%)attempts 11–18goals 0–1

  3. Pachal – Solovyov7:33

    xG 0.29–0.76 (28%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart11:31

    xG 0.93–0.16 (85%)attempts 18–6goals 0–0

  2. Nosek – Greer – Gadjovich8:12

    xG 0.84–0.49 (63%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Bennett – Rodrigues – Samoskevich11:33

    xG 0.35–0.27 (56%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  4. Boqvist – Luostarinen – Lundell9:53

    xG 0.09–0.29 (24%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchmidt – Balinskis9:48

    xG 1.02–0.13 (89%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Schmidt – Forsling2:14

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Ekblad – Forsling13:42

    xG 0.52–0.28 (65%)attempts 14–9goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.1 xGCGY 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 9/100 · #1198 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.73 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 84% of the time.

FLA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).