Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 6, 2025·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Seattle Kraken 3, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 84% of the time.

NSH winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA1507213325
NSH11731116534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:32SEAAdam LarssonAssists: Vince Dunn, Kaapo Kakko · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:15NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Colton Sissons · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:33NSHBrady SkjeiAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:48NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Marc Del Gaizo · Deflected, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P2 19:51NSHMichael McCarronGWGAssists: Ozzy Wiesblatt, Justin Barron · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 13:31SEAJared McCannPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Andre Burakovsky · Slap, 0.08 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:15NSHLuke EvangelistaENAssists: Steven Stamkos, Spencer Stastney · Wrist, 0.72 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:14SEAMichael EyssimontAssists: Josh Mahura · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 8:02SEAAdam Larsson: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:58NSHJake Lucchini: Holding2 min
  3. P3 8:10NSHSteven Stamkos: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 11:37NSHFilip Forsberg: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
43% to win57% to win
← SEA attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEANSH
25Shots on goal34
1.9Expected goals4.0
58Shot attempts63
19Faceoffs won31
3Power plays1
2Penalty minutes6
24Hits26
16Blocked shots22
21Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. Eyssimont – Melanson – Meyers7:22

    xG 0.33–0.31 (52%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  2. Burakovsky – McCann – Wright5:40

    xG 0.13–0.18 (41%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

  3. Eberle – Stephenson – Tolvanen9:32

    xG 0.25–0.48 (34%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  4. Schwartz – Kakko – Beniers9:26

    xG 0.26–0.74 (26%)attempts 10–13goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. Larsson – Dunn15:32

    xG 0.60–0.77 (44%)attempts 21–11goals 1–1

  2. Oleksiak – Montour14:35

    xG 0.42–0.81 (34%)attempts 10–22goals 0–1

  3. Mahura – Evans11:40

    xG 0.12–0.72 (14%)attempts 5–19goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – Smith – Svechkov10:10

    xG 0.84–0.10 (89%)attempts 19–5goals 0–1

  2. Stamkos – O'Reilly – Evangelista11:40

    xG 0.81–0.40 (67%)attempts 12–16goals 1–1

  3. McCarron – Lucchini – Wiesblatt8:22

    xG 0.37–0.25 (60%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  4. Marchessault – Forsberg – Sissons9:34

    xG 0.23–0.53 (30%)attempts 6–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnglund – Barron15:02

    xG 0.73–0.11 (87%)attempts 21–9goals 2–0

  2. Stastney – Del Gaizo14:11

    xG 0.96–0.59 (62%)attempts 20–16goals 0–0

  3. Skjei – Blankenburg15:50

    xG 0.67–0.83 (45%)attempts 13–19goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 4.0 xGSEA 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #441 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.93 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 84% of the time.

NSH winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).