Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 13, 2025·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TBL171715011320
PHI1928011012429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:29TBLGage GoncalvesPPAssists: Yanni Gourde, Ryan McDonagh · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:20PHIBobby BrinkAssists: Olle Lycksell, Ryan Poehling · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:15TBLZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Erik Cernak, Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:55PHIBobby BrinkAssists: Sean Couturier · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:01PHIRyan PoehlingAssists: Olle Lycksell, Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:50TBLCam AtkinsonAssists: Victor Hedman, J.J. Moser · Snap, 0.10 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  2. 2. TBL Jake Guentzel stopped
  3. 3. PHI Matvei Michkov scored
  4. 4. TBL Brayden Point scored
  5. 5. PHI Bobby Brink stopped
  6. 6. TBL Victor Hedman stopped
  7. 7. PHI Sean Couturier stopped
  8. 8. TBL Brandon Hagel stopped
  9. 9. PHI Owen Tippett scored
  10. 10. TBL Oliver Bjorkstrand stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:47PHIRyan Poehling: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:30PHIBobby Brink: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:12TBLJ.J. Moser: Holding2 min
  4. P2 8:38PHIBobby Brink: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 10:54TBLRyan McDonagh: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← TBL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLPHI
20Shots on goal29
2.4Expected goals2.9
54Shot attempts59
29Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
19Hits19
11Blocked shots16
15Giveaways20
11Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGuentzel – Paul – Point6:56

    xG 0.23–0.08 (75%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Girgensons – Cirelli – Hagel11:37

    xG 0.43–0.36 (54%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Bjorkstrand – Paul – Goncalves3:19

    xG 0.03–0.10 (25%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – Bjorkstrand – Goncalves5:21

    xG 0.04–0.13 (25%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Moser9:41

    xG 0.69–0.40 (63%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Perbix – Lilleberg8:15

    xG 0.32–0.17 (65%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Moser – Lilleberg4:18

    xG 0.03–0.08 (31%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestPoehling – Lycksell – Brink9:24

    xG 0.41–0.03 (92%)attempts 9–2goals 2–0

  2. Couturier – Tippett – Michkov14:29

    xG 0.54–0.31 (63%)attempts 17–10goals 0–1

  3. Konecny – Cates – Foerster13:02

    xG 0.32–0.42 (43%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  4. Deslauriers – Abols – Pelletier4:56

    xG 0.08–0.41 (17%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestZamula – Andrae12:10

    xG 0.69–0.10 (88%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – York17:44

    xG 0.67–0.27 (72%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0

  3. Seeler – Drysdale12:10

    xG 0.16–0.65 (19%)attempts 10–12goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.9 xGTBL 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #283 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).