Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 16, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Anaheim Ducks 2, St. Louis Blues 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 69% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0711117225
STL21034212726

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:41STLBrayden SchennAssists: Dylan Holloway, Jordan Kyrou · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 1:30STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Jake Neighbours, Cam Fowler · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:19STLDylan HollowayPPGWGAssists: Justin Faulk, Jordan Kyrou · Slap, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:06ANACutter GauthierAssists: Radko Gudas, Mason McTavish · Snap, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:39STLRadek FaksaAssists: Alexey Toropchenko, Nathan Walker · Snap, 0.19 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:10STLMathieu JosephSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–5
  7. P3 2:23ANANikita NesterenkoAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 6:18STLJake NeighboursPPAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Justin Faulk · Snap, 0.11 xG2–6
  9. P3 12:19STLOskar SundqvistPPAssists: Zachary Bolduc, Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.28 xG2–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 17:23STLBrayden Schenn: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  2. P1 17:23STLBrayden Schenn: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 17:23ANAJacob Trouba: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 19:55ANARyan Strome: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 2:45STLTyler Tucker: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 7:53ANAJacob Trouba: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 17:14STLJustin Faulk: Closing hand on puck2 min
  8. P3 5:48ANAMason McTavish: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P3 10:38ANARyan Strome: Slashing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 15:21STLNathan Walker: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 16:31ANATrevor Zegras: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Schenn won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASTL
25Shots on goal26
2.3Expected goals3.4
52Shot attempts58
24Faceoffs won24
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
18Hits25
17Blocked shots15
15Giveaways14
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Strome – Vatrano – Terry9:59

    xG 0.10–0.22 (32%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Nesterenko – McTavish – Gauthier10:14

    xG 0.62–0.81 (43%)attempts 13–11goals 2–1

  3. Harkins – Lundeström – Leason7:06

    xG 0.00–0.34 (1%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  4. Killorn – Zegras – Carlsson8:23

    xG 0.26–0.64 (29%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – Zellweger14:56

    xG 0.26–0.11 (71%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Helleson – Mintyukov11:46

    xG 0.41–0.69 (37%)attempts 15–15goals 1–1

  3. Gudas – LaCombe13:11

    xG 0.05–1.11 (4%)attempts 6–16goals 0–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSundqvist – Joseph – Bolduc9:21

    xG 0.89–0.35 (72%)attempts 18–8goals 0–1

  2. Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway8:19

    xG 0.49–0.10 (83%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  3. Faksa – Walker – Toropchenko10:03

    xG 0.44–0.09 (83%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  4. Buchnevich – Thomas – Neighbours8:39

    xG 0.33–0.30 (52%)attempts 4–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Tucker13:31

    xG 0.97–0.24 (80%)attempts 19–9goals 1–1

  2. Faulk – Broberg12:58

    xG 0.63–0.28 (69%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. Leddy – Fowler13:41

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 14–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.4 xGANA 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #778 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +10 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 69% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).