Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 26, 2025·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

San Jose Sharks 6, Minnesota Wild 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS210291511625
MIN280631702533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:28SJSWilliam EklundPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Dmitry Orlov · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:35SJSMichael MisaAssists: Timothy Liljegren · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:02MINMarcus JohanssonPPAssists: Marco Rossi, Brock Faber · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:34MINMarco RossiAssists: Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:15SJSWilliam EklundAssists: Philipp Kurashev · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:34SJSRyan ReavesAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Ty Dellandrea · Deflected, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 4:28MINRyan HartmanPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:52SJSTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini, William Eklund · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–3
  9. P3 8:28MINZeev BuiumAssists: Ryan Hartman, Yakov Trenin · Wrist, 0.01 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:42MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Brock Faber · Tip-in, 0.08 xG5–5
  11. OT 3:47SJSMacklin CelebriniGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG6–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 4:47MINVinnie Hinostroza: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:07SJSDmitry Orlov: Holding2 min
  3. P1 15:28SJSVincent Iorio: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:14SJSDmitry Orlov: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 3:11SJSMichael Misa: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:59MINJake Middleton: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Rossi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSMIN
25Shots on goal33
2.9Expected goals3.6
46Shot attempts77
31Faceoffs won28
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
22Hits17
18Blocked shots12
18Giveaways15
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudette – Graf – Misa5:38

    xG 0.63–0.07 (90%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Reaves – Goodrow – Dellandrea3:10

    xG 0.26–0.02 (92%)attempts 7–3goals 1–1

  3. Wennberg – Kurashev – Eklund13:59

    xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 6–13goals 1–1

  4. Eklund – Graf – Misa3:17

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDesharnais – Dickinson8:47

    xG 0.48–0.19 (72%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  2. Orlov – Liljegren15:26

    xG 1.04–0.76 (58%)attempts 13–13goals 2–1

  3. Ferraro – Iorio13:09

    xG 0.25–0.25 (50%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy3:52

    xG 0.11–0.05 (70%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Hinostroza – Hartman – Trenin8:16

    xG 0.35–0.31 (53%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  3. Pitlick – Jones – Yurov3:44

    xG 0.07–0.23 (23%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  4. Johansson – Kaprizov – Rossi12:23

    xG 0.49–0.73 (40%)attempts 8–6goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Faber14:13

    xG 0.71–0.41 (63%)attempts 19–8goals 2–0

  2. Spurgeon – Brodin2:16

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Faber – Buium4:07

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.6 xGSJS 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #24 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.69 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).